Tag Archives: Pelosi

SBA List Poll: Voting for Abortion-Funded Obamacare is Political Suicide

The Susan B Anthony List, a great organization that helps to elect pro-life women, distributed a poll last week in several of the targeted congressional districts of pro-life Democrats. These Dems are part of Congressman Bart Stupak’s soldiers – those Democrats who are not happy that the current healthcare bill they are being asked to vote on funds abortion on demand with government dollars.

No doubt the Obama Administration and Nancy Pelosi are doing their best to arm twist as many of these Congressmen and women as possible. The polling results below should give them extra ammo to vote NO. We showed some of the best questions and answers below in handy charts.

Worth noting is that not only do their constituents oppose taxpayer funds paying for abortions through healthcare but that voting for this bill would be political suicide.

Also, here’s a couple highlights from the overall polling numbers:

  • 3/5 agreed that abortion and abortion funding have no place in healthcare legislation
  • 2/3 don’t want to use tax dollars to pay for abortions
  • Over 50% say they would not vote for a candidate who votes for healthcare legislation that includes federal government funding of abortion.

Full results are here: www.sba-list.org/poll.

INDIANA’S 8TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSMAN BRAD ELLSWORTH

 

 

 

 

 

INDIANA’S 9TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSMAN BARON HILL

 

 

 

 

 

PENNSYLVANIA’S 11TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSMAN PAUL KANJORSKI

 

 

 

 

 

 

PENNSYLVANIA’S 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSMAN JASON ALTMIRE

 

 

 

 

 

 

OHIO’S 16TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSMAN JOHN BOCIERI

 

 

 

 

 

 

OHIO’S 9TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSWOMAN MARCY KAPTUR 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OHIO’S 6TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSMAN CHARLIE WILSON 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OHIO’S 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: CONGRESSMAN STEVE DRIEHAUS

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Sebelius Doubletalk; Stupak Not Backing Down

Headlines like this don’t get old -“Could Issue of Abortion Derail Health Care Bill?”

And neither does Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI), a pro-life Catholic Democrat who, over and over again has said he (and many of his colleagues) will not vote for any bill that funds abortion with government dollars.

President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Planned Parenthood, et al must be fuming. President Obama completely ignored Minority Leader John Boehner’s concern about this during last week’s healthcare summit and Nancy Pelosi is back to her talking points that the bill doesn’t change the status quo on abortion funding.

On Good Morning America this morning, Dept. of Health & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius (remember her? – she and the late late-term abortionist George Tiller were very close) said that the bill doesn’t change the status quo on abortion.

However, on Dec. 22, 2009 Sebelius specifically said that the Senate bill is an “accounting procedure” and that everyone would pay into the abortion fund:

SEBELIUS:That would be an accounting procedure, but everybody in the exchange would do the same thing, whether you’re male or female, whether you’re 75 or 25, you would all set aside a portion of your premium that would go into a fund, and it would not be earmarked for anything, it would be a separate account that everyone in the exchange would pay.”

Stupak followed Sebelius this morning on Good Morning America and said he and his pro-life colleagues cannot vote for a bill that contains language that funds abortion. But then he took it even farther:

STEPHANOPOULOS: “Let me be clear here.  If the president doesn’t change the language, if your language is not accepted, you and your 11 colleagues who voted yes the last time will vote no this time. Does that mean you’re prepared to take responsibility for bringing down this whole bill?”

STUPAK: “Yes, we’re prepared to take responsibility. I mean, I’ve been catching it ever since last fall.  Let’s face it, I want to see health care. But we’re not going to bypass some principles and beliefs that we feel strongly about.”

See the whole GMA segment here: http://bit.ly/aDJoOk

As readers of this blog know, the Senate bill, which is the one Obama’s new bill mirrors, absolutely and without a doubt funds abortion with government money. There is even an “abortion fee” levied through that bill that goes to the abortion fund Sebelius was talking about. We don’t know how Pelosi, Obama and their allies say that it doesn’t fund abortion.

Obama has made it clear he wants Congress to use the tricky procedure of reconciliation to pass/ram through his unpopular healthcare reform (he’s been playing close attention to recent elections as you can tell). The power lies in the House -the bill HAS to pass the House of Representatives before it can go to Obama for his signature and then to the Senate for a majority vote.

You know what you have to do. This is it. The endgame has arrived – don’t let up in contacting your elected officials and tell them you’re not fooled by Obama’s rhetoric. You know abortion funding is in the bill and you don’t want it.

And pray for Rep. Stupak and his allies. No doubt he has the weight of the most powerful people in the world upon his shoulders and they want him to cave to their demands.

—————————————————————————————————

Report from LifeNews:

Richard Doerflinger, the associate director of the pro-life office of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops put Pelosi’s myth to bed.

“We do not know how anyone who has spoken to the bishops could conclude that the Senate health care bill does not fund abortions. As the bishops have said in their letters to Congress, abortion problems in the Senate bill are so serious that, despite our strong support for expanding access to health care, we will have to oppose the bill unless they are resolved,” he said.

“While the Senate bill includes some language limiting the direct use of tax credits to subsidize abortion coverage, it still violates longstanding federal precedent on abortion funding in two ways,” Doerflinger explained.

“First, the Senate’s abortion language limits only use of tax credits for abortion in qualified health plans, not other funding in the bill. For example, the bill authorizes and appropriates $7 billion for services at community health centers (increased to $11 billion in the President’s new proposal). The Hyde amendment does not prevent direct use of these billions of dollars for elective abortions (because the funds are not provided through the appropriations bill governed by Hyde); nor does any provision in the Senate bill,” the pro-life Catholic leader said.

“Second, the Senate’s language on tax credits still allows subsidies for overall health plans that cover elective abortions, against the policy of the Hyde amendment and other longstanding federal laws. The bill requires each American purchasing such a plan to make a separate payment to the insurer every month, solely to pay for other people’s abortions. This is an enormous imposition on the consciences of the millions of Americans who oppose abortion,” Doerflinger concluded in his statement.

  • Share/Bookmark

Big Week in Healthcare Coming Up

A lot will be happening on healthcare next week. Not satisfied that the American people have soundly rejected their healthcare plans, that includes government-funding of abortion, President Obama, Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi are back to pushing their own agenda hard.

President Obama is meeting with GOP leaders next Thursday, Feb. 25th, which will be aired live, to talk about coming up with a bi-partisan healthcare plan. But before that he will be releasing his own reconciliation healthcare bill and posting it online either late this weekend or Monday morning. The President wants this bill to be the starting point of negotiations during the GOP healthcare meeting.

Has Obama mentioned abortion? Of course he hasn’t. But here’s the thing. Abortion HAS to be addressed somehow in the healthcare bill. If there is no specific exclusion of abortion written into the bill, like the Stupak Amendment did, then you and I will be funding abortion through healthcare. Period.

Obama knows it. Pelosi knows it. Reid knows it. And Americans know it too. We’ve written on several national polls showing that Americans overwhelmingly disapprove of government-funding of abortion.

Thanks to the heroic efforts of Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI), Nancy Pelosi is going to have a heck of a hard time passing a healthcare bill in the House that doesn’t include his amendment.

Be vigilant. Read the new bill. And contact your legislators. Like we have said, healthcare reform isn’t over yet. Obama and his allies are desperate for a healthcare bill and they are desperate to pay back all the support they have received from the abortion industry. And from the looks for it, they will do anything whatsoever to get it.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pelosi Corrected By Bishop…. AGAIN!

This one almost slipped by unnoticed, but thanks to a friend I came across this recent public chastisment of Nancy Pelosi by Archbishop George Niederauer of San Francisco after comments she made last month about her disagreements with Church teaching.  Ms. Pelsoi, as only Ms. Pelosi can do, managed once again to completely misrepresent the faith she claims she so avidly follows.

Anyway, the news here is not Pelosi’s heretical ramblings.  Those have been well documented before.  The news here is that another bishop has risen to publically correct those ramblings – to make sure that the liberals no longer go unchecked when they pretend to evenagelize in the media. 

The St. Michael Society is happy to report on the courage and leadership that is being shown by many of our American bishops since the Obama-Notre Dame scandal.  This time, Archbishop Niederauer gets the props.  If you have a moment, send him your thanks, support and prayers.  (you can contact him at info@sfarchdiocese.org)

Here is his open letter to Nancy Pelosi on the real meaning of conscience, free will, and what it means to be a Catholic.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pelosi called out for being a fake Catholic theologian

nancy_pelosi

Politics Daily has a good piece calling out Nancy Pelosi for months and months of publically proclaiming to be an “ardent and practicing Catholic”, yet getting every fact about the faith wrong.

 “Interviewed by Eleanor Clift for Newsweek’s year-end issue, Pelosi capped an 18-month succession of clamorously incorrect public statements about what Catholics believe with her own take on the meaning of freedom.”

Perhaps in one of the Speaker’s bigger gaffe’s regarding the Catholic faith, in response to a question on when life begins, around the time of the 2008 Presidential election on Meet the Press, she said – “I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time. And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition.”

 I remember our priests at Sunday Mass absolutely livid over her statements. Because she’s a public figure, many bishops thankfully stood up and did their job of helping to lead souls to the truth and declare her statements completely false and against Church teaching.

 The article is definitely worth a read and is getting a lot of commentary from readers. Check it out here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pat Buchanan and the Church Militant

Human Events has posted Pat Buchanan’s latest artcle which gives a great summary of the many reasons for conservative Catholics to have much hope.  Over the past several months (beginning mainly with the Notre Dame fiasco) it has been really encouraging to see so many bishops stepping up to be a strong voice for orthodoxy and to ensure that heretics are not dictating what is or what is not acceptable for Catholics to believe.

SMS highly recommends that you kick back with a glass of wine and a leftover turkey leg while you read Buchanan’s piece over at Human Events.

  • Share/Bookmark

It’s Far From Over – Subsidiarity, The Bishops and Health Care

by Patrick Looby

It is a fundamental principle of social philosophy, fixed and unchangeable, that one should not withdraw from individuals and commit to the community what they [individuals] can accomplish by their own enterprise and industry.” – Pope Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno

On September 29, I wrote about the Catholic principle of subsidiarity, warning that Catholics need to be careful about focusing just on the single issue of abortion  in their objections to Obamacare, instead of focusing on the bigger problem of the public option which makes all other evils possible.

As long as it is a government-controlled public option, then any prohibition of abortion (or any evil) is illusory anyway.  Any so-called guarantee we get that abortion will not be included is only as good as the next election, or the next round of Supreme Court appointments.  (Remember – we live in a country where the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness co-exists with the right to kill your unborn child)

While it was quite an accomplishment to obtain a bipartisan prolife majority, 240 votes for the pro-life Stupak-Pitts Amendment prohibiting federal dollars from paying for abortion in health care, prolifers are right to realize that the Stupak amendment is likelty to get scrapped in conference.  In the end, Pelosi needed to allow some type of no-abortion funding measure to pass in order to have a chance at getting the broader bill through.  Pro-life leaning, vulnerable Democrats, and a handful of blue dogs made it clear to her they needed to be able to go home and say they voted against abortion funding in health care.  The good news is, unlike the phony Capps and Ellsworth Amendments, Stupak does have teeth, but those teeth are likely to get pulled in conference.    

So if the US Bishops don’t clarify the Catholic position on subsidiarity as it relates to this debate, then this chess move on the part of Pelosi may just work, and we will be looking at socialized medicine.  For it is the public option in the bill that is the most dangerous part, as it makes all things possible.

As Father David Bosnich clearly wrote back in the 1990s when the Clintons tried to take over the health care system, subsidiarity is one of the key tenets of Catholic social teaching, stating “that nothing should be done by a larger or more complex organization that can be done by a smaller and simpler organization.”  Back then, Catholics felt the same frustration when the US Bishops seemed to focus only on abortion in the HillaryCare debate, and were not being clear that centralizing governmental control of social programs like health care was also contrary to Catholic teaching, because it opens the door to abuse of power and enslaves mankind to a welfare state mentality.

Just about every pope in the last 150 years has warned against the modern movement toward welfare states.  Overreliance on the government makes man into a slave of the state as it turns off his inner drive to be self-sufficient and responsible for his actions.

Even with good motives on the part of politicians, the temptation is just too great to increase people’s reliance on the government, for it creates powerful voting blocks of people who now must continue to vote for politicians who promise to maintain their way of life.  One’s livelihood and happiness is no longer dependent on individual productivity in the community, but on the button that is pressed in the voting booth.  “Why work for what I need, when I can just vote someone in who will give it to me free of charge?” becomes the mentality in a welfare state that has continually violated the principles of subsidiarity.

In fact, the abortion debate is nothing more than an indication of the problem of government run health care.  The fact that milions of Americans were glued to c-span hoping there would be enough votes to prohibit their tax dollars from paying for elective abortion should be enough for anyone to understand the principle of subsidiarity.  That experience of being powerless is what happens when we unnecessarily surrender power to the state.

We haven’t even had the debate on whether or not our public insurance plan will consider feeding tubes as ordinary or extraordinary care.  (Remember Terri Schaivo?)   Or whether or not homosexual partners will be given a family plan.  Or whether or not sterilization will be covered as birth control.  Or whether embryonic stem cell therepy will be covered.  etc. etc. etc.

All of these issues, and plenty we haven’t even thought of because the technology is not developed yet, will be left to a political vote.  We will not have any consumer power in determining what is acceptable in society, but will be at the mercy of whichever political philosophy has the majority in government.

Thomas Peters at American Papist, and Raymond Arroyo expressed the same concern that the bishops have not been more outspoken against the public option.  It almost appears to be a replay of the 1990s. 

However, the difference between now and the 1990s is that we have had some courageous bishops who have written against this assault on freedom.  But, what we need desperately as this debate moves on to the Senate, is a unified statement from the conference against this government takeover of health care.

-  Mr. Looby is a graduate of Wadhams Hall Seminary and has been teaching Theology and Philosophy for 13 years.  In addition, he is a freelance writer and speaker on issues pertaining to the Catholic faith.

  • Share/Bookmark

Abortion: The Healthcare Holdup

bulldozerHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to bulldoze healthcare reform through the House this week but is being held up by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-MI), and many others who share his views on abortion, who are trying to make sure abortion is not funded by the government.

Pelosi and her pro-abortion allies are desperately trying to come up with a compromise to strip away pro-life Dems from Stupak’s coalition but so far, it’s a no-go.

pelosi whisperIt’s either the government funds abortion or it doesn’t. No wonder they can’t reach a compromise.

Not to get into the weeds too much but a fake compromise was brought up by Rep. Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) that was promptly shot down which basically let the government hire out contractors to pay for abortion services. Any thinking person could see through that smokescreen. National Right to Life is working overtime to make sure everyone knows how fake this compromise really is: http://bit.ly/2udXnw.
Pelosi has got to be pulling her hair out at this point. Here’s what major news outlets are reporting:

New York Times - The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, a supporter of abortion rights, has little choice but to heed the concerns of members of her caucus who oppose abortion.  

The HillBut Ellsworth’s plan has run into opposition from anti-abortion rights groups. The U.S. Conference of Bishops has rejected the “segregated-funds” approach. “They’re not strengthening the language, they’re strengthening their camouflage,” said Douglas Johnson of National Right to Life.

 Reuters - Democrats in the House of Representatives scrambled on Wednesday to iron out lingering concerns over abortion in a healthcare reform bill that was headed to a close and potentially historic weekend debate.

 It’s not over yet so please continue to reach out to your elected officials and tell them you don’t want abortion funding in the healthcare bill.

 As Catholics, we have a civic duty to voice our concerns when a grave injustice is being committed in our society. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, in section 2238, says-

 [Catholics] loyal collaboration includes the right, and at times the duty, to voice their just criticisms of that which seems harmful to the dignity of persons and to the good of the community. (emphasis ours)

 Contact your Representatives HERE.

  • Share/Bookmark

Catholic Bishops Ask for Your Help to Stop Abortion Funding

Congress is preparing to debate health care reform legislation.  The Catholic bishops of the United States strongly support genuine health care reform that protects the life and dignity of all, from the moment of conception until natural death. However, all current bills are seriously deficient on abortion and conscience rights, and do not yet provide adequate access to health care for immigrants and the poor.

With this link, you’ll find a special flier from the US Bishops Conference that you can share with others asking us to please contact your Representative and Senators immediately and urge them to fix these bills with pro-life amendments. 

Additionally this web address that allows you to send an email message to Congress with a click of a button. The bishops have asked for our swift action and the commitment of our prayers for this critical effort.  Thank you for your help.  We can help make sure that health care reform will be about saving lives, not destroying them.  

Let us pray:

That Congress will act to ensure that needed health care reform will truly protect the life, dignity and health care of all and that we will raise our voices to protect the unborn and the most vulnerable and to preserve our freedom of conscience. We pray to the Lord.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This post is excerpted from a USCCB letter.

  • Share/Bookmark

Backing Up Bart

Healthcare reform is coming down to the wire and the Associated Press notes this morning that abortion is indeed dividing House Democrats. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is pulling out all the stops to make sure she has the votes she needs to pass a healthcare reform bill – and to make sure that abortion will be paid for by government dollars.

bart_stupak_official_109th_congress_photoBut one Democratic Congressman is doing everything he can to make sure that doesn’t happen. Congressman Bart Stupak, a Democrat from Michigan and a Catholic, is bucking his party leaders and standing up for the unborn. He has an amendment that says in plain language no government funds will be used to fund abortion through healthcare.

In fact, Stupak’s amendment (Congressman Joe Pitts (R-PA) is the co-sponsor) is the onlyway that abortion will be excluded from the healthcare bill.

 Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) says that the Dems have done everything they can to make sure abortion is not included in healthcare. Um….right. Then why did you vote down at least 5 different amendments in committee that would have explicitly included abortion? Oh right, because you have 100% pro-abortion vote rating from NARAL.

But what about the Hyde Amendment, doesn’t that already make sure the government doesn’t fund abortions? Nope, it sure doesn’t. Want to read why? See here and here.

How It’s Going to Go Down

Since Congress is ultimately a governing body and makes laws, it means sometimes they do complicated things that we members of the general public could care less about. However, this time we have to pay attention.thumbs-up

Congressman Stupak’s amendment must be allowed on the House floor for a vote to make sure abortion is excluded from healthcare. But pro-abortion Catholic Speaker Nancy Pelosi has to give the okay to let it go to the floor.

Stupak made is clear to Pelosi that unless his amendment comes to the floor for a vote, he will vote with the Republicans to stop the debate on the health care bill – which has to happen for the giant, massive H.R. 3200 to come to the floor for a vote at all.

If Stupak and his pro-life Democrat colleagues are successful in stopping the House from adopting the rules for debate, Pelosi may not be able to have a vote at all on healthcare reform. The Associated Press story this morning says that Stupak may very well have the votes to do that.

Pelosi and her pro-choice allies have repeatedly said that abortion is not included in healthcare reform. If they are so confident, why not let a specific exclusion of abortion be included in the bill?

 What can you do?

 1)      Thank Congressman Stupak for standing up for the unborn. He’s in a difficult position and is doing the right thing. Send him a note here.

2)      Contact Speaker Pelosi’s office and tell her to allow a vote on Congressman Stupak’s amendment. Contact her office here.

  • Share/Bookmark