<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>St Michael Society &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com</link>
	<description>Defending and Promoting the Faith in the Public Square</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Should Faithful Catholics Vote?</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/11/01/how-should-faithful-catholics-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/11/01/how-should-faithful-catholics-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Probbio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prolife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members of Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usccb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/11/01/how-should-faithful-catholics-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Kagan Abortion Distortion Spreads</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/07/07/the-kagan-abortion-distortion-spreads/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/07/07/the-kagan-abortion-distortion-spreads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Probbio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve highlighted Shannen Coffin’s analysis of documents  from Obama Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan concerning partial-birth abortion. It is interesting to see how far her distortion from in 1996 spread.  When she twisted the words of The American College of Obstetricians &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/07/07/the-kagan-abortion-distortion-spreads/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/07/07/the-kagan-abortion-distortion-spreads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion Distortion By Obama Nominee</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/29/abortion-distortion-by-obama-nominee/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/29/abortion-distortion-by-obama-nominee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Probbio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shannen Coffin has an INCREDIBLE piece running on NRO today on the abortion issue and a partial birth abortion case. It is a chilling example of how Obama&#8217;s nominee for the Supreme Court Elena Kagan cooked the legal books for political gain. When President &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/29/abortion-distortion-by-obama-nominee/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/29/abortion-distortion-by-obama-nominee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the Lips of Walter Dellinger to the Ears of God</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/23/from-the-lips-of-walter-dellinger-to-the-ears-of-god/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/23/from-the-lips-of-walter-dellinger-to-the-ears-of-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Probbio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prolife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What was probably a publicity stunt to energize pro-abortion activists on the eve of the nomination hearings of Obama&#8217;s latest Supreme Court pick Elena Kagan, former acting Solicitor General Walter Dellinger predicted Tuesday night that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/23/from-the-lips-of-walter-dellinger-to-the-ears-of-god/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/23/from-the-lips-of-walter-dellinger-to-the-ears-of-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writings of Supreme Court Nominee Kagan</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/15/writings-of-supreme-court-nominee-kagan/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/15/writings-of-supreme-court-nominee-kagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Probbio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kagan nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members of Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For two weeks on Friday afternoon the Clinton Library released public documents belonging to President Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.  Writings from her time in the Clinton White House are quite troubling.  Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network has written extensively concerning the documents and posted &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/15/writings-of-supreme-court-nominee-kagan/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/06/15/writings-of-supreme-court-nominee-kagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Lifers Weigh In On Obama Supreme Court Nominee, Elena Kagan</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/10/pro-lifers-weigh-in-on-obama-supreme-court-nominee-elena-kagan/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/10/pro-lifers-weigh-in-on-obama-supreme-court-nominee-elena-kagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KHernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elena kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kagan nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pro-life groups are speaking out today against President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan. There isn’t much of a paper trail on Kagan but from what pro-lifers have been able to glean, and the fact that NARAL has thrown their support behind &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/10/pro-lifers-weigh-in-on-obama-supreme-court-nominee-elena-kagan/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/10/pro-lifers-weigh-in-on-obama-supreme-court-nominee-elena-kagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oops, She Did It Again</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/07/oops-she-did-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/07/oops-she-did-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KHernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’d rather not write about this since it’s so depressing but hopefully bishops will take into account Nancy Pelosi’s loooong list of public transgressions against the Roman Catholic Church, of whom she considers herself a member, and consider serious disciplinary &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/07/oops-she-did-it-again/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/07/oops-she-did-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuns Face Consequences of Supporting Healthcare Reform Bill</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/04/nuns-face-consequences-of-supporting-healthcare-reform-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/04/nuns-face-consequences-of-supporting-healthcare-reform-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KHernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usccb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the tail end of the healthcare reform fight, several supposedly Catholic orders of nuns weighed in for the bill, even though it funded abortion and didn’t protect the conscience rights of healthcare professionals. They signed a letter that went &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/04/nuns-face-consequences-of-supporting-healthcare-reform-bill/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/05/04/nuns-face-consequences-of-supporting-healthcare-reform-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Abortion Clinic Opens Up in MI Because of Healthcare Law</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/28/new-abortion-clinic-opens-up-in-mi-because-of-healthcare-law/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/28/new-abortion-clinic-opens-up-in-mi-because-of-healthcare-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KHernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guttmacher Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Bart Stupak’s home state of Michigan, a new abortion clinic is opening up as a direct result of the new healthcare bill that funds abortion on demand with government dollars. If you remember, Congressman Stupak caved at the 11th &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/28/new-abortion-clinic-opens-up-in-mi-because-of-healthcare-law/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/28/new-abortion-clinic-opens-up-in-mi-because-of-healthcare-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Anyone Expect a Good Supreme Court Nominee from Obama? No.</title>
		<link>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/22/does-anyone-expect-a-good-supreme-court-nominee-from-obama-no/</link>
		<comments>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/22/does-anyone-expect-a-good-supreme-court-nominee-from-obama-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KHernandez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=3218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama, who is probably worn out from the year long healthcare battle, has yet another fight ahead as he prepares to pick his 2nd nomination for the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is a very powerful entity and can &#8230; <a href="http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/22/does-anyone-expect-a-good-supreme-court-nominee-from-obama-no/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stmichaelsociety.com/2010/04/22/does-anyone-expect-a-good-supreme-court-nominee-from-obama-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

