Tag Archives: legislation

Cohabitation Is Not Healthcare

Health Care Bill Discriminates Against Marriage

As each day goes by, more of what is contained in the healthcare legislation is exposed. House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio reveals in a news conference that the House bill contains a severe “marriage penalty” for middle class couples. Under the bill, couples living together would spend less on health insurance than married couples. Here are the relevant facts as reported by the Catholic News Agency:

…under the House bill an unmarried couple with an income of $25,000 each would have a premium cap of $3,076, but if they marry their $50,000 combined income would make their annual premium cap jump to $5,160.

Now for members of secular society, concerns about cohabitation might be an outdated or silly notion, but for Catholics this is a real concern.  The Church teaches that living together and sexual union before marriage is inherently sinful and trivializes the sacredness of the marital sacrament (Catechism of the Catholic Church, nos. 2350-2400) Catholics should not be financially penalized for staying true to our faith, and we don’t need additional financial pressure to be added to the many other cultural pressures that encourage young people today to cohabitate.

Many readers of Saint Michael Society will be contacting their elected officials concerning the abortion funding. Please include this item in your talking points. Healthcare should reinforce marriage not encourage cohabitation.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pro-Life Leaders Take to the Opinion Pages

leaders

 Two opinion pieces published today hit the nail on the head when it comes to abortion and healthcare.

 Four powerhouse pro-life leaders, Dr. Charmaine Yoest (AUL), Marjorie Dannenfelser (SBA List), Kristan Hawkins (Students for Life) and David Bereit (40 Days for Life), call out Planned Parenthood and the rest of the abortion industry in today’s Washington Times for actively trying to mislead the public on the merits of the Stupak Amendment:

Earlier this month, New York Democratic Rep. Nita Lowey claimed that the Stupak-Pitts Amendment “puts new restrictions on women’s access to abortion coverage in the private health insurance market even when they would pay premiums with their own money.” Just days later, PolitiFact.com issued an analysis and said her comments were “false.”

Planned Parenthood’s cover has been blown. Before the vote on Stupak-Pitts, there were no uproars from the abortion lobby about government funding of abortion in the health care bill. There were no send-your-legislator-a-hanger campaigns. Why? Because they were hoping this issue would slip under the radar and that the bill would pass without any specific exclusion of abortion, which would ensure that abortion would certainly be funded by the government.

Read the whole thing here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/06/abortion-funding-fiight-far-from-over/.

 And Kristan Hawkins has her own piece at CNSNews.com today as well talking about the Mikulski amendment that passed in the Senate that would provide government funding for “preventative healthcare.” Kristan makes the case that preventative healthcare would include abortion – and she has the knowledge to back it up.Kristan Hawkins and her son Gunner

As a mother of a son with cystic fibrosis, a genetic life-threatening disease, and pregnant with another son, who has a 25 percent chance of having the disease, I know the first “preventative” abortions will be performed on children diagnosed prenatally with incurable, expensive-to-treat genetic diseases.
 
Already, over 90 percent of babies prenatally diagnosed with Downs Syndrome are aborted. That’s certainly a “preventative” service.

 Kristan has become quite an expert on rationing of care in the healthcare bills and runs the website www.HealthcareForGunner.com to raise awareness.

See the full opinion piece here: http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/article/59320

  • Share/Bookmark

Healthcare: What’s Next?

UPDATE I: Politico has a story out this morning (12/23) saying that the timeline to get a bill to Obama now looks to be early to mid-February instead of before the State of the Union. More time to get a hold of your legislators to tell them no on abortion funding. Also, CNS News.com has an interview out today quoting Rep. Bart Stupak about the pressure he is recieving from the White House to stay quiet on abortion.

 

can-you-hear-me-nowBack in May and June, when the healthcare debate was just starting to heat up, there was hardly any mention of abortion. It just wasn’t an issue. When dozens of pro-life leaders, under the name of Stop the Abortion Mandate, got together in late July to host a webcast talking about how healthcare reform would be the “largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade”, did the media pick up on the fact that hey, maybe abortion is an issue.

And what an issue it is. Thanks to the hard work of many pro-life groups and a couple courageous Congressmen, Americans now know that healthcare reform, unless the Stupak language (named after Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Democrat from Michigan whose amendment makes sure the government doesn’t fund abortion) is in the final healthcare bill, the government will certainly be funding abortion.

This is wildly unpopular with the American people. Yet another national poll (I think we’re on #4 or 5) came out today, this time from the respected pollsters at Quinnipiac, which said 72-73% are against “using any public money in the health care overhaul to pay for abortions.”

So what happens next?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has to find some way to reconcile Stupak’s language with the coalition of pro-abortion members who say they won’t vote for anything that restricts abortion funding. And Stupak is sticking to his guns after Sen. Nelson caved over the weekend by selling out the unborn in exchange for the government to pick up Nebraska’s Medicaid payments.

DavidBrody_Blog_MDDavid Brody at CBN said today on this blog post “The Dirty Little Secret on Abortion and Healthcare Reform” that the healthcare vote could very well come down to what pro-abortion legislators are willing to give up over making you and I pay for abortion:

 Pro-life House Democrat Bart Stupak has publicly said his pro-life abortion language must stay in the final bill. He could take roughly 10 pro-life Democrats with him and vote AGAINST the final healthcare bill if his language is changed. That would sink the bill. At that point, pro-choicers would be pretty much forced into swallowing hard and accepting Stupak’s language into the final bill so healthcare reform can pass with Stupak’s gang of 10 OR they pro-choicers may say forget it. They may tell Pelosi that while they want healthcare reform in the worst way they want to protect women’s rights to abortion even more. Seriously, it really could come down to this.

 The New York Times also had a front page story today that laid out some of the issues facing the Democrats on the abortion issue as well. On any compromise on abortion,

 Ms. Pelosi’s room for maneuvering is limited because any changes to the language in the Senate bill could unravel the deal that provided Democrats with the 60 votes they need to get the legislation through the Senate.

  Here’s the timeline as best we can tell (it’s changing rapidly so we will probably update again soon):

  •  December 24th – 8am vote in the Senate on cloture to close the debate on the healthcare bill and move it out of the Senate.
  •  The first week of January – The House and Senate will have to convene in conference to merge the House & Senate bills. A couple things can happen here. One is that the conference committee can just adopt the Senate version of the bill, which including government funding of abortion, and let the House vote on that. Second is that they can hash out a new bill that merges them both together and the Senate and House will have to vote on that bill. Either way, abortion is going to be a big issue.
  • Mid-late January – Obama is desperate for a healthcare bill to be signed before the State of the Union address, currently scheduled for January 19th, so he’s going to do everything in his power to make sure that happens.

 Don’t give up now. We have to redouble our efforts. As we have heard, the Stop the Abortion Mandate people are being deluged with emails from grassroots people saying that they can’t reach their Senators and Congressmen because the lines have been shut down and emails are bouncing back.

How about going to visit your Representatives at their district offices? Go here to find your local office: http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/. Yesterday, the Family Research Council led a group of 150 concerned citizens to Senator Mary Landrieu’s district office in Louisiana because they couldn’t reach her by phone. They were met by a federal marshal telling them her offices were closed for the holidays!

So your Senators can vote on a massive government takeover of healthcare at 1am the morning of Christmas week and then tell you their offices are closed?!

Again, don’t give up. Remember, in the end, the fight has already been won.Cross

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

  • Share/Bookmark

Healthcare Bill Goes from Bad to Worse

Erick Erickson at Red State is reporting a troubling late addition to the Health Care Legislation.  Quote from Red State:

Reid has slipped in a provision into the health care legislation prohibiting future Congresses from changing any regulations imposed on Americans by the Independent Medicare [note: originally referred to as "medical"] Advisory Boards, which are commonly called the “Death Panels.

harry reidOne more reason to work to defeat this terrible legislation.  Its important for Catholics not to give up and continue to let Congress know that this cannot stand.   Here is a story that quotes the Bishops and other prolife leaders.

We at St Michael Society ask that you take a moment during this busy week to join the fight.  Stop the Abortion Mandate has some great tools that you can use.

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

  • Share/Bookmark

BREAKING: Exclusive Stupak Interview tonight on EWTN: “Don’t underestimate me.”

bart_stupak_official_109th_congress_photoCongressman Bart Stupak, a Catholic Democrat from Michigan, is going on the World Over Live tonight with Raymond Arroyo on EWTN at 8pm to talk about his meeting this week at the White House regarding abortion funding in healthcare.

Get ready for fireworks.

 Rep. Stupak isn’t backing down. A couple quotes we’ve obtained from the interview tonight:

STUPAK’S MESSAGE TO THE PRESIDENT:  So what’s your preference Mr. President?  Do you want a healthcare bill or do you want to fight on abortion? They’re not going together.

Listen here: Stupak – Mr President

THE BOTTOM LINE: “If it does not have the language we want, as some leadership asked me yesterday, what happens?  I said Bill’s dead.  It’s going nowhere.  He said: ‘how can you say that you haven’t seen it?’  I said, ‘I’m just telling you where the line is and we’re not crossing that line.’  And they said: “You’re serious?” I said, “Don’t underestimate me.  You did that once.  We’re serious, we need that language.”

Listen here: Stupak – The language we want

The World Over airs live on EWTN at 8PM Friday and Saturday at 1AM, Sunday at 4PM, Monday at 10AM and 11PM.

  • Share/Bookmark

Can’t Save The Environment By Declaring War On Creation

Environmentalist that advocates for massive changes in US life style and wealth transfers to developing countries displayed their ugly side yesterday. A story titled Population Control Called Key To Deal in the China Daily exposed what has been a fear here at St Michael Society; the environmental movement’s war on children in the womb.  Here is one of many horrible quotes from the story:

 “Although China’s family planning policy has received criticism over the past three decades, Zhao said that China’s population program has made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society.”

 As a result of the family planning policy, China has seen 400 million fewer births, which has resulted in 18 million fewer tons of CO2 emissions a year, Zhao said.”

A refresher; “China’s family planning policy” is nothing to be proud of and includes forced abortions as a way to enforce their mandated one child per family law.  Saving the environment does not include declaring war on children in the womb. Nor does it include removing the gift of creation from the sexual act.

UP DATE:  Finacial Post runs a horrible op-ed that concludes climate warming or cooling is not the problem, but humans are overpopulating the world and the world should adopt the China one child policy.

Let’s be clear. We are all called upon to be good responsible stewards of creation.  The world around us is a living display of God’s great love for mankind.  As we have written before, we at St Michael Society do not oppose legitimate efforts to ensure that we pass on this gift intact to future generations. 

On the other hand, we will fight any effort that pits mother against child in her womb, husband against wife or couple against their gift of making a new life.  Population control can never be a solution.

  • Share/Bookmark

Catholic Bishops Ask for Your Help to Stop Abortion Funding

Congress is preparing to debate health care reform legislation.  The Catholic bishops of the United States strongly support genuine health care reform that protects the life and dignity of all, from the moment of conception until natural death. However, all current bills are seriously deficient on abortion and conscience rights, and do not yet provide adequate access to health care for immigrants and the poor.

With this link, you’ll find a special flier from the US Bishops Conference that you can share with others asking us to please contact your Representative and Senators immediately and urge them to fix these bills with pro-life amendments. 

Additionally this web address that allows you to send an email message to Congress with a click of a button. The bishops have asked for our swift action and the commitment of our prayers for this critical effort.  Thank you for your help.  We can help make sure that health care reform will be about saving lives, not destroying them.  

Let us pray:

That Congress will act to ensure that needed health care reform will truly protect the life, dignity and health care of all and that we will raise our voices to protect the unborn and the most vulnerable and to preserve our freedom of conscience. We pray to the Lord.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This post is excerpted from a USCCB letter.

  • Share/Bookmark

Backing Up Bart

Healthcare reform is coming down to the wire and the Associated Press notes this morning that abortion is indeed dividing House Democrats. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is pulling out all the stops to make sure she has the votes she needs to pass a healthcare reform bill – and to make sure that abortion will be paid for by government dollars.

bart_stupak_official_109th_congress_photoBut one Democratic Congressman is doing everything he can to make sure that doesn’t happen. Congressman Bart Stupak, a Democrat from Michigan and a Catholic, is bucking his party leaders and standing up for the unborn. He has an amendment that says in plain language no government funds will be used to fund abortion through healthcare.

In fact, Stupak’s amendment (Congressman Joe Pitts (R-PA) is the co-sponsor) is the onlyway that abortion will be excluded from the healthcare bill.

 Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) says that the Dems have done everything they can to make sure abortion is not included in healthcare. Um….right. Then why did you vote down at least 5 different amendments in committee that would have explicitly included abortion? Oh right, because you have 100% pro-abortion vote rating from NARAL.

But what about the Hyde Amendment, doesn’t that already make sure the government doesn’t fund abortions? Nope, it sure doesn’t. Want to read why? See here and here.

How It’s Going to Go Down

Since Congress is ultimately a governing body and makes laws, it means sometimes they do complicated things that we members of the general public could care less about. However, this time we have to pay attention.thumbs-up

Congressman Stupak’s amendment must be allowed on the House floor for a vote to make sure abortion is excluded from healthcare. But pro-abortion Catholic Speaker Nancy Pelosi has to give the okay to let it go to the floor.

Stupak made is clear to Pelosi that unless his amendment comes to the floor for a vote, he will vote with the Republicans to stop the debate on the health care bill – which has to happen for the giant, massive H.R. 3200 to come to the floor for a vote at all.

If Stupak and his pro-life Democrat colleagues are successful in stopping the House from adopting the rules for debate, Pelosi may not be able to have a vote at all on healthcare reform. The Associated Press story this morning says that Stupak may very well have the votes to do that.

Pelosi and her pro-choice allies have repeatedly said that abortion is not included in healthcare reform. If they are so confident, why not let a specific exclusion of abortion be included in the bill?

 What can you do?

 1)      Thank Congressman Stupak for standing up for the unborn. He’s in a difficult position and is doing the right thing. Send him a note here.

2)      Contact Speaker Pelosi’s office and tell her to allow a vote on Congressman Stupak’s amendment. Contact her office here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Sisters of Life Speaking Out on Healthcare Reform

Mother Anges Mary, SV with the Sisters of Life talks with www.StMichaelSociety.com concerning health care.  Her message: 

  1. Abortion is not health care.
  2. We need to pray and act.


We have compiled all the information you need to know here. http://stmichaelsociety.com/?p=457

  • Share/Bookmark

Hiding Behind the Hyde Amendment

The Susan B. Anthony List has taken a creative and somewhat humorous approach in attempting to explain why the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits government money from funding some abortions, does NOT apply to current healthcare proposals. Many elected officials are hiding behind the Hyde Amendment when questioned by their constituents or the media on whether or not abortion will be funded by government money through healthcare.

In reality, the Hyde Amendment is completely sidestepped in current healthcare proposals and does not apply, which opens up an entire new source of money in the government that will go to funding abortions.

Here’s a 70 second explanation:

  • Share/Bookmark