Tag Archives: Kagan nomination

Writings of Supreme Court Nominee Kagan

For two weeks on Friday afternoon the Clinton Library released public documents belonging to President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.  Writings from her time in the Clinton White House are quite troubling.  Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network has written extensively concerning the documents and posted summaries here and here. Catholics and people of faith should be concerned about these points:

Abortion.  Kagan helped President Clinton articulate his position against the Hyde Amendment and in favor of federal funding of abortion.  She corresponded with the Legal Director of NARAL regarding trying to slow the progress of passage of the Child Custody Protection Act which would have made it a federal offense to transport a minor across a state line for an abortion to avoid parental consent laws.

On the other side of the issue, Kaganrecommended for political reasons that President Clinton sign a partial birth abortion ban with Daschle’s amendment for a health exception, despite his own Department of Justice advising him that such a law would be unconstitutional and his administration’s general opposition of the law.  Of course the breadth of the term “health” as legally interpreted is sufficient to make any ban on partial birth abortion practically meaningless, and in 2007 the Supreme Court found that even a ban of the procedure without a health exception was constitutional.
 
Kagan believes the constitution contains a nearly unfettered right to partial-birthabortion, an extreme position the Supreme Court ultimately rejected.  She opposed a ban on partial-birthabortion, even one with an exception for the mother’s health, because she believed it took away one “safe” abortion technique from abortion providers and thus burdened the right of women to abort their pre-viable children for literally any reason they pleased.  The Supreme Court, by contrast, upheld a partial birth abortion ban even without a health exception and cited the state’s substantial interest in “promoting respect for human life at all stages in the pregnancy” by not allowing “a doctor to pierce the skull and vacuum the fast-developing brain of [a mother’s] unborn child, a child assuming the human form.”
 
Religious language.  Kagan was asked to clean up a video-taped speech given by the President commemorating the 25th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. She appears to have recommended deleting the “God bless you” salutation at the end of the speech.
Share

Pro-Lifers Weigh In On Obama Supreme Court Nominee, Elena Kagan

Pro-life groups are speaking out today against President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan. There isn’t much of a paper trail on Kagan but from what pro-lifers have been able to glean, and the fact that NARAL has thrown their support behind her, confirming Kagan would be a serious setback for the unborn.

President Obama said just recently that while he doesn’t have a litmus test for a nominee, he does want ”somebody who is going to be interpreting our Constitution in a way that takes into account individual rights, and that includes women’s rights.” We have to presume Kagan fits that description.

A big concern that is Kagan has indicated she may be sympathetic to using international laws to make and interpret laws in the US, including an unlimited abortion right.

Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, told LifeNews.com that “abortion groups are actively attempting to create the impression that international norms require countries to provide access to abortion. During Kagan’s nomination hearing for Solicitor General, Senator Specter questioned her about the use of foreign sources of law in constitutional decision-making.”

Students for Life of America launched www.IOpposeKagan.com this morning and are asking people to sign a petition in opposition to confirming Elena Kagan.

And Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, said that “Elena Kagan has strong ties to abortion-advocacy organizations and expressed admiration for activist judges who have worked to advance social policy rather than to impartially interpret the law.”

On background on Elena Kagan, AUL revealed that:

Kagan not only publicly and repeatedly criticized federal regulations that prohibited recipients of Title X family planning funds from counseling on or referring women for abortions, she argued that the regulations amounted to the subsidization of ‘anti-abortion’ speech. Kagan will further entrench the Court’s self-appointed role as the sole arbiter of abortion policy because she believes the role of judges is to ‘advance’ social policy rather than faithfully apply the law. 

Stay tuned to St. Michael Society for continual updates regarding the Supreme Court battle.

Share

Conservative Legal Experts React to Kagan Supreme Court Nomination

Following are two resourceful sites from the Federalist Society and the Judicial Crisis Network that will provide up to date information, news reports, commentary, etc, regarding the Supreme Court nomination of Elena Kagan. Also, below is a link to conservative legal expert comments regarding the Kagan nomination and coming hearing.

http://www.scotusreport.com

http://www.judicialnetwork.com/

CONSERVATIVE LEGAL EXPERTS REACT TO KAGAN NOMINATION

http://www.judicialnetwork.com/news/conservative-legal-experts-react

Share