Tag Archives: Health Care Bill

Stupak Digs In As Nelson Sells Out on Abortion Funding in Health Care Bill

Senator Ben Nelson has sold out the unborn and has announced that he is ready to support Senator Harry Reid’s abortion funding health care bill.  If passed, Senator Reid’s health care bill will lead to the largest expansion of abortion since the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision allowing abortion on demand.  (One has to wonder what that decision would have been if the Court had been shown sonograms.) Nelson’s fascade came to an end when Reid offered money to Nelson for his home state of Nebraska. In return for this scam, Nelson has watered down his bill which will allow federal funding of abortion, but, oh, states can opt out of the government exchange if  they want.  This move undercuts the pro-life, pro-Hyde Stupak-Pitts Amendment.  But as Senator Nelson caves, Congressman Stupak is digging in, calling the Nelson abortion funding compromise, “unacceptable.”

Senator Ben Nelson

Senator Ben Nelson

 

Here is how the following days will play out.

The mangers amendment released by Senator Reid now appears to have the 60 votes necessary to end debate and pass the health care reform bill in the Senate. The first in a series of cloture votes (vote to end debate on an amendment or bill) is expected around 1 am Monday morning If all goes as currently projected, the Senate would pass the health care bill sometime next week If the Senate passes its bill, there will then likely be a House-Senate Conference to negotiate the differences between the House and Senate language.  The House and Senate would then have to approve the modifications made in the conference.  In a statement released today Pro-life Caucus Co-chair Bart Stupak (D-MI) said “While I and many other pro-life Democratic House members wish to see health care coverage for all Americans, the proposed Senate language is unacceptable.”

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops responded immediately to the Nelson abortion funding Amendment. Statement here.

For more information please visit:

www.stoptheabortionmandate.comNational Right to Life Committee, and Americans United for Life

How ironic that as we ready for the coming of our Lord in this Advent season, that during Christmas week, the week of the birth of our savior, the United States Senate is going to pass a health care bill that provides federal funding for the taking of  innocent human life.  

St. Michael Society is encouraging all of our friends, followers and supporters to please pray to our Holy Mother to continue to give Congressman Bart Stupak, and other supporting Democrats, the will and the courage to stand their ground and defend innocent human life against a wave of pressure.  We also pray to Our Holy Mother for the protection of the unborn and for a culture of life in the face of an America that continues to head further and further down the road toward a culture of death. 

Finally, we encourage all to call their Senators and Representatives and tell them, no to a health care bill that leads to a massive funding of abortion, essentially an abortion industry pay out, and no to government run health care that leads to rationed care and euthanasia.

Senate: 202.224.3121

House: 202.225.3121

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Paying for Assisted Suicide in Health Care Bill

 Assisted Suicide

Suicide Doc Jack Kevorkian

Suicide Doc Jack Kevorkian

 

Relevant Concerns from the House Health Care Reform Bill, H.R. 3962

  Summary

 Two sections of H.R. 3962 promote end-of-life planning that will include assisted suicide in states where it is legal. One provision mandates the dissemination of end-of-life planning materials to all individuals insured through the Exchange.  The other authorizes federal Medicare reimbursement for end-of-life planning.  Information provided under both provisions will include assisted suicide options in those states where it is legal. 

  

 Provisions in H.R. 3962

 

Section 240, authored by Rep. Baron Hill (D-IN), requires insurance companies to “provide for the dissemination of information related to end-of-life planning to individuals seeking enrollment in Exchange-participating health benefits plans offered through the Exchange” and shall present “(A) the option to establish advanced directives and physician’s orders for life sustaining treatment according to the laws of the State in which the individual resides; and (B) information related to other planning tools.”

The Hill amendment states that the material in this section “shall not include advanced directives or other planning tools that list or describe as an option suicide, assisted suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing.”  Unfortunately, this section is meaningless in the states that have legalized assisted suicide.  In such states (see below) the term “death with dignity” is used to describe what is commonly known as assisted suicide, and the law defines “death with dignity” such that it is statutorily not considered assisted suicide.

Language in the Hill amendment as offered and passed in Committee anticipated this complication and included a prohibition on providing materials that promoted the intentional “hastening of death.”  This language, intended to cover scenarios in which the term assisted suicide is redefined, was stripped out the bill by House leaders prior to reintroduction of the bill.

 

The outcome of the Hill language will be that the federal government will require insurance companies to distribute end-of-life planning material that could include information about assisted suicide in the states where it is legal.  A vote to approve this language is a vote to encourage assisted suicide. 

Section 1233, included at the request of Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) adds “advance care planning consultations” as a new optional Medicare-covered benefit. The consultation must be between a physician (or other health care professional) and the patient, and may be conducted every five years or more often if the patient’s condition worsens. The pro-life community has raised serious concerns about the potential for coercing seniors to make end-of-life choices that are cost saving, but not life-affirming. 

With regard to assisted suicide, language in the section specifies that “Nothing in this section shall–…encourage the promotion of suicide or assisted suicide.”  However, as is the case with the Hill amendment, this reference is without substantive meaning in states that have legalized and redefined the term “assisted suicide.”

The outcome of the Blumenauer language is that Medicare will pay for end-of-life consultations that include assisted suicide options (under the euphemism of “death with dignity”) in states where assisted suicide is legal.

Operative State Laws Nullifying Assisted Suicide References

Both Oregon and Washington have legalized what is commonly known as assisted suicide.  In those states assisted suicide is referred to as “death with dignity.”  In crafting state laws, Oregon and Washington redefined the act of assisting in a suicide as “death with dignity,” explicitly stating that such action is not legally considered assisted suicide.

The Oregon law reads, “Actions taken in accordance with ORS 127.800 to 127.897 shall not, for any purpose, constitute suicide, assisted suicide, mercy killing or homicide, under the law. [1995 c.3 s.3.14]

The Washington law reads, “Actions taken in accordance with this chapter do not, for any purpose, constitute suicide, assisted suicide, mercy killing, or homicide, under the law.”

  • Share/Bookmark