Healthcare: What’s Next?

UPDATE I: Politico has a story out this morning (12/23) saying that the timeline to get a bill to Obama now looks to be early to mid-February instead of before the State of the Union. More time to get a hold of your legislators to tell them no on abortion funding. Also, CNS News.com has an interview out today quoting Rep. Bart Stupak about the pressure he is recieving from the White House to stay quiet on abortion.

 

can-you-hear-me-nowBack in May and June, when the healthcare debate was just starting to heat up, there was hardly any mention of abortion. It just wasn’t an issue. When dozens of pro-life leaders, under the name of Stop the Abortion Mandate, got together in late July to host a webcast talking about how healthcare reform would be the “largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade”, did the media pick up on the fact that hey, maybe abortion is an issue.

And what an issue it is. Thanks to the hard work of many pro-life groups and a couple courageous Congressmen, Americans now know that healthcare reform, unless the Stupak language (named after Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Democrat from Michigan whose amendment makes sure the government doesn’t fund abortion) is in the final healthcare bill, the government will certainly be funding abortion.

This is wildly unpopular with the American people. Yet another national poll (I think we’re on #4 or 5) came out today, this time from the respected pollsters at Quinnipiac, which said 72-73% are against “using any public money in the health care overhaul to pay for abortions.”

So what happens next?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has to find some way to reconcile Stupak’s language with the coalition of pro-abortion members who say they won’t vote for anything that restricts abortion funding. And Stupak is sticking to his guns after Sen. Nelson caved over the weekend by selling out the unborn in exchange for the government to pick up Nebraska’s Medicaid payments.

DavidBrody_Blog_MDDavid Brody at CBN said today on this blog post “The Dirty Little Secret on Abortion and Healthcare Reform” that the healthcare vote could very well come down to what pro-abortion legislators are willing to give up over making you and I pay for abortion:

 Pro-life House Democrat Bart Stupak has publicly said his pro-life abortion language must stay in the final bill. He could take roughly 10 pro-life Democrats with him and vote AGAINST the final healthcare bill if his language is changed. That would sink the bill. At that point, pro-choicers would be pretty much forced into swallowing hard and accepting Stupak’s language into the final bill so healthcare reform can pass with Stupak’s gang of 10 OR they pro-choicers may say forget it. They may tell Pelosi that while they want healthcare reform in the worst way they want to protect women’s rights to abortion even more. Seriously, it really could come down to this.

 The New York Times also had a front page story today that laid out some of the issues facing the Democrats on the abortion issue as well. On any compromise on abortion,

 Ms. Pelosi’s room for maneuvering is limited because any changes to the language in the Senate bill could unravel the deal that provided Democrats with the 60 votes they need to get the legislation through the Senate.

  Here’s the timeline as best we can tell (it’s changing rapidly so we will probably update again soon):

  •  December 24th – 8am vote in the Senate on cloture to close the debate on the healthcare bill and move it out of the Senate.
  •  The first week of January – The House and Senate will have to convene in conference to merge the House & Senate bills. A couple things can happen here. One is that the conference committee can just adopt the Senate version of the bill, which including government funding of abortion, and let the House vote on that. Second is that they can hash out a new bill that merges them both together and the Senate and House will have to vote on that bill. Either way, abortion is going to be a big issue.
  • Mid-late January – Obama is desperate for a healthcare bill to be signed before the State of the Union address, currently scheduled for January 19th, so he’s going to do everything in his power to make sure that happens.

 Don’t give up now. We have to redouble our efforts. As we have heard, the Stop the Abortion Mandate people are being deluged with emails from grassroots people saying that they can’t reach their Senators and Congressmen because the lines have been shut down and emails are bouncing back.

How about going to visit your Representatives at their district offices? Go here to find your local office: http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/. Yesterday, the Family Research Council led a group of 150 concerned citizens to Senator Mary Landrieu’s district office in Louisiana because they couldn’t reach her by phone. They were met by a federal marshal telling them her offices were closed for the holidays!

So your Senators can vote on a massive government takeover of healthcare at 1am the morning of Christmas week and then tell you their offices are closed?!

Again, don’t give up. Remember, in the end, the fight has already been won.Cross

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

Healthcare Bill Goes from Bad to Worse

Erick Erickson at Red State is reporting a troubling late addition to the Health Care Legislation.  Quote from Red State:

Reid has slipped in a provision into the health care legislation prohibiting future Congresses from changing any regulations imposed on Americans by the Independent Medicare [note: originally referred to as "medical"] Advisory Boards, which are commonly called the “Death Panels.

harry reidOne more reason to work to defeat this terrible legislation.  Its important for Catholics not to give up and continue to let Congress know that this cannot stand.   Here is a story that quotes the Bishops and other prolife leaders.

We at St Michael Society ask that you take a moment during this busy week to join the fight.  Stop the Abortion Mandate has some great tools that you can use.

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

BREAKING: Exclusive Stupak Interview tonight on EWTN: “Don’t underestimate me.”

bart_stupak_official_109th_congress_photoCongressman Bart Stupak, a Catholic Democrat from Michigan, is going on the World Over Live tonight with Raymond Arroyo on EWTN at 8pm to talk about his meeting this week at the White House regarding abortion funding in healthcare.

Get ready for fireworks.

 Rep. Stupak isn’t backing down. A couple quotes we’ve obtained from the interview tonight:

STUPAK’S MESSAGE TO THE PRESIDENT:  So what’s your preference Mr. President?  Do you want a healthcare bill or do you want to fight on abortion? They’re not going together.

Listen here: Stupak – Mr President

THE BOTTOM LINE: “If it does not have the language we want, as some leadership asked me yesterday, what happens?  I said Bill’s dead.  It’s going nowhere.  He said: ‘how can you say that you haven’t seen it?’  I said, ‘I’m just telling you where the line is and we’re not crossing that line.’  And they said: “You’re serious?” I said, “Don’t underestimate me.  You did that once.  We’re serious, we need that language.”

Listen here: Stupak – The language we want

The World Over airs live on EWTN at 8PM Friday and Saturday at 1AM, Sunday at 4PM, Monday at 10AM and 11PM.

Share

Updated- Senate to Vote on Gov’t Funding of Abortion Today

UPDATED: Senate tables the Nelson-Hatch amendment 54-45,(Dem Senators Conrad, Bayh, Casey, Pryor, Dorgan, and Nelson  voted in favor). Statements for the media from pro-life leaders are below. And the Family Research Council is holding a news conference call @ 6:05pm ET on the vote – call 866-939-3921 .

STATEMENTS FROM PRO-LIFE LEADERS ON THE VOTE TO TABLE THE NELSON-HATCH AMENDMENT
December 8, 2009

Tony Perkins
President of Family Research Council Action
“In rejecting the Nelson-Hatch amendment, pro-abortion Senators have broken the three decade long truce over government funding of abortion and have demonstrated they would rather have mandate federal funding for abortion than enact ‘health care reform.’

Wendy Wright
President, Concerned Women for America
“Nelson-Hatch is a reasonable amendment that does one thing: ensures federal funds are not spent on elective abortions. What the government funds, we get more of. Without this amendment, the bill will violate two of Pres. Obama’s promises: that the bill will not fund abortion and that he will work to reduce abortions. Since abortion costs less than delivery of a baby, it is not unlikely that bureaucrats, facing pressure to reduce costs, will sign off on paying for abortion but not for the health care that pregnant women and their babies need. If the bill does not explicitly bar the funding of abortion, bureaucrats and activist judges will require federal funding of this deadly procedure.  If more children are aborted, who will pay for this massive government entitlement when it balloons in 20 years?”

Douglas Johnson
Legislative Director, National Right to Life Committee
“The focus now shifts to the all-important cloture vote on the Reid bill itself, which is a 60-vote hurdle.  Let the message be heard clearly across the land:  Any senator who votes for cloture on Reid’s bill is voting to establish two big new federal programs that will subsidize abortion on demand.”

Charmaine Yoest
President, Americans United for Life Action
“A vote to table the amendment is a vote against the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment. A majority of Senators effectively endorsed the abortion lobby’s goal of mainstreaming abortion as health care. The Senate health care reform bill explicitly allows the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to include abortion coverage in the ‘community health insurance option,’ and allows federal subsidies to go to private insurance plans that include abortion coverage.  In addition, the bill also requires that at least one private plan in each exchange provide coverage for all abortions. The Senate had the opportunity to follow the House’s lead in ensuring that federal dollars are not used to pay for abortions.  Instead, the Senate chose to reject the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment and continue down the road towards unprecedented federal funding of abortion.”

Ashley Horne
Federal Issues Analyst, Focus on the Family Action
“Today, the U.S. Senate failed to protect the preborn and ignored the will of the people they represent. Although 67 percent of Americans oppose the use of federal money to pay for abortion in any government-run healthcare, Senators nevertheless rejected the Hatch-Nelson amendment. Their vote would compel Americans who have moral and religious objects to abortion – and who now make up the majority of the country – to fund it. This is what Thomas Jefferson described as ‘tyrannical.’ Focus on the Family continues to oppose the health care bill because it fails to protect the most vulnerable among us – the preborn. We will keep working diligently to ensure that this faulty legislation does not pass by giving a voice to the millions of Americans who oppose the use of federal funds to pay for abortion.”

Steven Ertelt
Editor and CEO, LifeNews.com
“Senators who opposed the Nelson amendment should be ashamed of themselves for hypocritically calling for ‘choice’ yet forcing Americans to pay for abortions through the health care bill. Their real agenda is exposed through their own votes — they want unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy for any reason funded by the American people. That’s not pro-choice, it is radically pro-abortion.”

 Jennifer Giroux
Executive Director, One More Soul
“Senators think they can dress up abortion and call it ‘healthcare’ but today God fearing American tax-payers have now been forced to pay for an infant holocaust for the first time in our nation’s history.”

 _____________________________

abortion comic stripSenator Sam Brownback (R-KS) described the debate this afternoon in the Senate on the Nelson-Hatch Amendment, which makes sure the government doesn’t fund abortions, as “unusual.” Why? Because the debate is supposed to be about healthcare, not abortion, and certainly not about abortion funding, especially since it has been precedent for the past 30 years that the government does not fund elective abortion.

What’s the big deal? The abortion industry has a lot to gain if the government starts funding abortion, as Charmaine Yoest writes in her open letter to Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards today:

“This Senate health care bill is a bailout for the world’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood. Their lobbying efforts are said to be about empowering women and advancing reproductive health but the bottom line is that Planned Parenthood needs the business.”

The Senate, by most accounts, will vote this afternoon on the Nelson-Hatch amendment. Have you called your Senator and told them to vote in favor of the Nelson amendment and against government funding of abortion?

Go HERE for contact info for your Senators.

Need talking points? Here are the main points we are using below. Feel free to send them to your family and friends and get the word out.

 1) If the Senate healthcare bill is passes without Stupak or Nelson language, it will be the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade.

  • Senators must be urged to vote against any procedure or bill that does not include language identical to either the Nelson or Stupak Amendments, which prevent the government from funding abortion.
  • Abortion is not healthcare, as the abortion industry would like Americans to believe, and it should not be mandated under any health insurance plan, especially one that Americans will be forced to subsidize.

 2) Government-Run Health Care = a bailout of the abortion industry, mandated government-funded abortion, and forcing Americans to subsidize abortions.

  • Americans don’t want this. Recent national polls have all showed Americans don’t support government-funded abortions by wide margins. 
  • The proposed “public plan” would pay for elective abortions, which would be direct funding of elective abortion with federal funds.  This abortion coverage would not be optional – no one would be able to enroll in federal insurance plan without paying an abortion surcharge.
  • In addition, the federal government would subsidize the purchase of private health plans that cover elective abortion on demand — departing from decades of federal policy, under which health plans that cover elective abortions (for example, those covering federal employees) are not eligible for federal subsidies.

 3) The bi-partisan Stupak-Pitts amendment and the Nelson-Hatch amendment do not change the status quo on abortion funding through the government; it IS the status quo. They both mirror the Hyde amendment which prevents the government from funding elective abortion.

Share

Pat Buchanan and the Church Militant

Human Events has posted Pat Buchanan’s latest artcle which gives a great summary of the many reasons for conservative Catholics to have much hope.  Over the past several months (beginning mainly with the Notre Dame fiasco) it has been really encouraging to see so many bishops stepping up to be a strong voice for orthodoxy and to ensure that heretics are not dictating what is or what is not acceptable for Catholics to believe.

SMS highly recommends that you kick back with a glass of wine and a leftover turkey leg while you read Buchanan’s piece over at Human Events.

Share

Historic Christian & Catholic Manifesto on Hot Topics Released Today

Christian leaders, both Catholics and Evangelicals, said in no uncertain terms today that they will not be silenced when it comes to issues of grave moral concern including abortion, same-sex marriage and stem-cell research.

The leaders will be releasing a manifesto today called the Manhattan Declaration, as reported in the New York Times. It states:

 “We will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other antilife act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent.”

Cross Christian ethics are under attack. You may think the First Amendment protects these rights or that conscience clause language (which President Obama has already started the procedure to rescind) makes sure doctors and other medical professionals are not discriminated against or lose their jobs for refusing to do abortions or other life-ending procedures.

 They don’t, which is why it’s come to this.

 The Catholic Church and Christian leaders are not imposing their views on anyone but if forced to comply with laws that are contrary to moral absolutes, be assured will not yield.

 Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council said this today:

Without question there will be critics yelling ‘separation of church and state.’ This is silly: we are imposing our denominational views on no one. We are bringing our faith to bear on public policy because we see the efforts of the Left as a frontal assault on human dignity, the American family, and the future of our children. For this reason, we will not retreat an inch and will make the case for life, marriage, and religious liberty in the public square.

 What an encouragement for all Catholics and Christians today who are struggling in their fight to uphold traditional morals and values in a world that has seemingly ignored all sense of right and wrong.

 It is our hope that the U.S. Congress reads and considers this manifesto seriously since the healthcare reform bills are in direct opposition to the sanctity of life in many regards.

 View the entire 4700 word manifesto here: http://demossnews.com/ManhattanDeclaration

Share

President Obama: Planned Parenthood’s Puppet

obama puppetWhere does one draw the lines when accusing another of being purposely deceitful? Perhaps when it can easily be proven through an extensive paper/video trail.

President Obama clearly needs to pay back the abortion industry for their extensive support and he owes them dearly. So much so that he is quite clearly a puppet at the hands of Planned Parenthood and their allies.

As long as Obama said that no federal funds would pay for abortion but continued to work behind-the-scenes to make sure the opposite was true, Planned Parenthood kept quiet and only urged their members to make sure that reproductive care was funded by the government in healthcare reform.

But once the Stupak amendment passed the House a week ago, all hell broke loose and PP sought a good return on their investment, making sure that President Obama would do everything he could to strip the Stupak language from the healthcare bill.

The quotes below easily catch President Obama trying to please both sides of the debate while getting caught in obvious deception:

“In my mind reproductive care is essential care; it is basic care. So it is at the center and at the heart of the plan I propose. Essentially what we are doing is to say that we are going to set up a public plan…it will be a plan that will provide all essential services, including reproductive services. We also will subsidize those who prefer to stay in the private insurance market except the insurers will have to abide by the same rules in terms of providing comprehensive care including reproductive care.”
-Senator Obama, Speech to Planned Parenthood, July 17, 2007

 “Under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions…”
-President Obama, Address to Congress, 9/9/09

“And we’re not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions. And I want to make sure that the provision that emerges meets that test—that we are not in some way sneaking in funding for abortions, but, on the other hand, that we’re not restricting women’s insurance choices…”
-President Obama, ABC News, 11/10/09

 “White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod suggested…President Obama will intervene to make sure a controversial amendment restricting federal funding for abortion coverage is stripped from final health care reform legislation.”
-Fox News, 11/15/09

Don’t be fooled. The President is going to do everything he can to make sure federal funds will pay for abortion. Not only is he the most pro-abortion president in history but he is beholden to the will of Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry.

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

Pro-Aborts in Full Damage Control Mode; Attack Catholic Church

The abortion industry is in full damage control mode after Saturday’s vote in the House passing the Stupak Amendment, which makes sure that no government money funds abortion. It passed the House with 240 bi-partisan votes, which is 20 more votes than what the overall healthcare passed with.

 NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan and Catholics for a Free Choice president Jon O’Brien took to the pages of Politico today to lash out against the country’s Catholic bishops and their supposed “double standard.”

 Nancy and Jon are clearly grasping at straws in their attack on the Catholic bishops. Here’s their op-ed below with our comments in red. Enjoy.

  Thomelogohe Catholic bishops’ double standard
By: Nancy Keenan and Jon O’Brien 
November 10, 2009 05:28 PM EST

 As advocates for reproductive health, we are outraged at what transpired in the House over the weekend.

 Translation: We want Americans to pay for abortions and we are livid that pro-lifers voted to make sure women pay for their own abortions.

 The passage of the Stupak-Pitts amendment goes far beyond the status quo on abortion restrictions and would make it nearly impossible for insurance plans in the new system to offer abortion coverage. 

 Actually, the Stupak-Pitts amendment put back the status quo on abortion restrictions into the healthcare bill – otherwise the bill would have blown the status quo out of the water by allowing the federal government to pay for abortion on demand.

This campaign succeeded in large part because its supporters perpetuated falsehoods about abortion coverage in the new system. 

 Why must the abortion industry continue to outright lie when it comes to this? I mean, doesn’t it get old once even liberal media outlets are proving you wrong? See the FactCheck.org article here, the TIME mag article here and the AP story here. FactCheck says: “Despite what Obama said, the House bill would allow abortions to be covered by a federal plan and by federally subsidized private plans.”

Most notably, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and its allies in the House distorted the facts about the health reform proposal by claiming that the proposed system would have used federal dollars to cover abortion care. They’re wrong. 

 See comment above. No, Nancy & Jon – you and everyone perpetuating your myths are wrong.

The original House bill included a compromise that required all plans to separate public and private dollars in the new system — ensuring that no tax dollars would ever cover abortion services. 

 Sure they did and it’s called the Capps Amendment which is a bookkeeping scheme and phony compromise. First, the amendment was written by staff to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Ca.), and offered by Rep. Lois Capps (D-Ca.), both of whom have 100 percent pro-abortion career records. Secondly, the Capps Amendment explicitly authorizes the federal government to pay for abortions and those that sign up for the public plan will be charged an “abortion surcharge.”

In fact, the bishops should be familiar with this arrangement because it reflects the same principle of separation that guides their financial interaction with the federal government. The bishops have a long history of almost unlimited access to enormous quantities of federal funding. When it comes to funding for Catholic schools and hospitals or programs run by Catholic Charities, they accept federal funding with open arms. The bishops never question their own ability to lawfully manage funds from separate sources to ensure that tax dollars don’t finance religious practices. 

 Catholics hold that a government-run “anything” should only be considered as an absolute last resort. We believe in subsidiarity - that the government shouldn’t take away from individuals what they (the individuals) can accomplish “by their own enterprise and industry.” (Pope Pius XI). Catholic Charities does great work, work that cannot be done if the government itself were handling. In fact, there is great risk to individual freedom once the government takes over something.

 Yet they reject the idea that others could do the same. This is the very definition of hypocrisy. 

 And you think that the government will siphon out funds and make sure Americans don’t pay for abortions? Are you serious?

For example, Catholic hospitals depend on federal funding. Indiana has 35 Catholic hospitals and 26 other Catholic health-care facilities. In 2007, 58 percent of patients who visited these facilities were covered by Medicaid or Medicare, a proportion reflected across the country. With well over half of their revenue coming from the government, it is safe to say that Catholic hospitals survive on government funding as well as contributions from private sources. 

Here’s where you both really took a wrong turn. One in six patients in the US is cared for in a Catholic hospital and you know where poor patients are sent who don’t have insurance? To a Catholic hospital. You fail to mention that the Senate bill lacks any sort of conscience protections for doctors and other healthcare professionals who decline to perform or refer for abortions – that’s because you want to force all doctors to perform abortions or don’t even become an ob-gyn, right? In a recent survey of faith-based physicians, when asked if they would do abortions or quit their jobs if the government forced them to make that decision, 95% said they’d quit. What if Catholic hospitals are forced to close or rather than perform abortions? Who will care for the hundreds of thousands of patients then? Some doctors have something to say about that here.

Catholic Charities, the domestic direct service arm of the bishops, also depends on state and federal dollars. Sixty-seven percent of Catholic Charities’ income comes from government funding. That represents over $2.6 billion in 2008 — an amount that is more than three times as large as the next largest charitable recipient of federal funds, the YMCA. Just as Catholic hospitals do, Catholic Charities receives enormous quantities of government dollars while abiding by existing constitutional and statutory requirements that prevent government sponsorship of religion. 

 What does this have to do with anything? Planned Parenthood gets hundreds of millions of dollars a year from taxpayers.

The bishops know that a vast majority of Americans, including Catholics, disagree with their hard-line dictates regarding reproductive-health care, including the bishops’ opposition to contraception.

 That is what the Catholic Church believes and has passed on through the centuries. It’s not a matter of debate. Accept that they have a different view than you both and move on.

However, when it comes to health care reform — from which many millions of people will benefit — the bishops injected divisive politics into the process and overran a compromise that would have guaranteed that no federal dollars would cover abortion care. 

 1) Rory Cooper at Heritage says that The U.S. Conference of Bishops has every constitutional protection under the first amendment to petition their government, without fear that the head of the Progressive Caucus will use the IRS to intimidate them, or call them “bullies.” 2) There is no compromise on federal funding of abortion – the government either funds abortion or it doesn’t. There never was a compromise that the bishops overran.

As this debate moves forward, U.S. senators and the public should challenge the bishops’ hypocrisy. If separation of federal funds and private dollars works for the church hierarchy, then it should also work for women’s reproductive-health care. 

 Catholics are called to live their faith in every area of their lives and government is no different (see Bishop Tobin’s  smackdown of Patrick Kennedy when politicians fail to do this in the public square). It’s the job of the Catholic bishops to lead and educate Catholics. U.S. Senators should be listening to their constituents – the majority of whom oppose government funding of abortion and who oppose a government takeover of healthcare overall.

Nancy Keenan is president of NARAL Pro-Choice America and Jon O’Brien is president of Catholics for Choice.

 © 2009 Capitol News Company, LLC 

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

Abortion: The Healthcare Holdup

bulldozerHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to bulldoze healthcare reform through the House this week but is being held up by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-MI), and many others who share his views on abortion, who are trying to make sure abortion is not funded by the government.

Pelosi and her pro-abortion allies are desperately trying to come up with a compromise to strip away pro-life Dems from Stupak’s coalition but so far, it’s a no-go.

pelosi whisperIt’s either the government funds abortion or it doesn’t. No wonder they can’t reach a compromise.

Not to get into the weeds too much but a fake compromise was brought up by Rep. Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) that was promptly shot down which basically let the government hire out contractors to pay for abortion services. Any thinking person could see through that smokescreen. National Right to Life is working overtime to make sure everyone knows how fake this compromise really is: http://bit.ly/2udXnw.
Pelosi has got to be pulling her hair out at this point. Here’s what major news outlets are reporting:

New York Times - The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, a supporter of abortion rights, has little choice but to heed the concerns of members of her caucus who oppose abortion.  

The HillBut Ellsworth’s plan has run into opposition from anti-abortion rights groups. The U.S. Conference of Bishops has rejected the “segregated-funds” approach. “They’re not strengthening the language, they’re strengthening their camouflage,” said Douglas Johnson of National Right to Life.

 Reuters - Democrats in the House of Representatives scrambled on Wednesday to iron out lingering concerns over abortion in a healthcare reform bill that was headed to a close and potentially historic weekend debate.

 It’s not over yet so please continue to reach out to your elected officials and tell them you don’t want abortion funding in the healthcare bill.

 As Catholics, we have a civic duty to voice our concerns when a grave injustice is being committed in our society. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, in section 2238, says-

 [Catholics] loyal collaboration includes the right, and at times the duty, to voice their just criticisms of that which seems harmful to the dignity of persons and to the good of the community. (emphasis ours)

 Contact your Representatives HERE.

Share

Stop the Abortion Mandate Webcast: TONIGHT

UPDATE: Missed the webcast? Listen here: http://click-here-to-listen.com/12345/ 
 
HeaderAbortion industry lobbyists and their allies in Congress are about to ram through mandated government funding of abortion in health care reform legislation possibly later THIS WEEK in the U.S. House of Representatives.
 
 To respond swiftly to this crisis, the pro-life movement is unifying TONIGHT at 9pm ET/6pm PT on a huge nationwide webcast — and your attendance is crucial:To register, go here: http://stoptheabortionmandate.com/webcast/#register 

Simply stated, if this abortion mandate is not stopped, it will result in the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade.

* WHAT: Stop the Abortion Mandate Urgent Webcast
* DATE: TONIGHT, Monday, November 2
* TIME: 9 PM Eastern, 8 PM Central, 7 PM Mountain,
6 PM Pacific
 
Stop the Abortion Mandate coalition is holding the urgent webcast to educate and call to action pro-life leaders and activists nationwide regarding abortion funding in healthcare legislation.
 
During the live webcast, you’ll hear the latest breaking news from nationally respected leaders. Invited presenters include:
 * REP. CHRIS SMITH, U.S. House of Representatives
* MARJORIE DANNENFELSER, Susan B. Anthony List
* CHARMAINE YOEST, Americans United for Life
* KRISTAN HAWKINS, Students for Life of America
* DAVID BEREIT, 40 Days for Life
* KELLYANNE CONWAY, The Polling Company
* WENDY WRIGHT, Concerned Women for America
* DOUGLAS JOHNSON, National Right to Life Committee
* KRISTEN DAY, Democrats for Life
* DR. DAVID STEVENS, Christian Medical & Dental
Associations
During the event, you will:
* Hear the LATEST UPDATES and news straight from our nation’s capital
* Learn exactly how abortion IS mandated in the proposed health care reform bills
* Discover what YOU can do about it!
 
Register for the important webcast now: http://stoptheabortionmandate.com/webcast/#register 
Share