BREAKING: Exclusive Stupak Interview tonight on EWTN: “Don’t underestimate me.”

bart_stupak_official_109th_congress_photoCongressman Bart Stupak, a Catholic Democrat from Michigan, is going on the World Over Live tonight with Raymond Arroyo on EWTN at 8pm to talk about his meeting this week at the White House regarding abortion funding in healthcare.

Get ready for fireworks.

 Rep. Stupak isn’t backing down. A couple quotes we’ve obtained from the interview tonight:

STUPAK’S MESSAGE TO THE PRESIDENT:  So what’s your preference Mr. President?  Do you want a healthcare bill or do you want to fight on abortion? They’re not going together.

Listen here: Stupak – Mr President

THE BOTTOM LINE: “If it does not have the language we want, as some leadership asked me yesterday, what happens?  I said Bill’s dead.  It’s going nowhere.  He said: ‘how can you say that you haven’t seen it?’  I said, ‘I’m just telling you where the line is and we’re not crossing that line.’  And they said: “You’re serious?” I said, “Don’t underestimate me.  You did that once.  We’re serious, we need that language.”

Listen here: Stupak – The language we want

The World Over airs live on EWTN at 8PM Friday and Saturday at 1AM, Sunday at 4PM, Monday at 10AM and 11PM.

Share

Updated- Senate to Vote on Gov’t Funding of Abortion Today

UPDATED: Senate tables the Nelson-Hatch amendment 54-45,(Dem Senators Conrad, Bayh, Casey, Pryor, Dorgan, and Nelson  voted in favor). Statements for the media from pro-life leaders are below. And the Family Research Council is holding a news conference call @ 6:05pm ET on the vote – call 866-939-3921 .

STATEMENTS FROM PRO-LIFE LEADERS ON THE VOTE TO TABLE THE NELSON-HATCH AMENDMENT
December 8, 2009

Tony Perkins
President of Family Research Council Action
“In rejecting the Nelson-Hatch amendment, pro-abortion Senators have broken the three decade long truce over government funding of abortion and have demonstrated they would rather have mandate federal funding for abortion than enact ‘health care reform.’

Wendy Wright
President, Concerned Women for America
“Nelson-Hatch is a reasonable amendment that does one thing: ensures federal funds are not spent on elective abortions. What the government funds, we get more of. Without this amendment, the bill will violate two of Pres. Obama’s promises: that the bill will not fund abortion and that he will work to reduce abortions. Since abortion costs less than delivery of a baby, it is not unlikely that bureaucrats, facing pressure to reduce costs, will sign off on paying for abortion but not for the health care that pregnant women and their babies need. If the bill does not explicitly bar the funding of abortion, bureaucrats and activist judges will require federal funding of this deadly procedure.  If more children are aborted, who will pay for this massive government entitlement when it balloons in 20 years?”

Douglas Johnson
Legislative Director, National Right to Life Committee
“The focus now shifts to the all-important cloture vote on the Reid bill itself, which is a 60-vote hurdle.  Let the message be heard clearly across the land:  Any senator who votes for cloture on Reid’s bill is voting to establish two big new federal programs that will subsidize abortion on demand.”

Charmaine Yoest
President, Americans United for Life Action
“A vote to table the amendment is a vote against the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment. A majority of Senators effectively endorsed the abortion lobby’s goal of mainstreaming abortion as health care. The Senate health care reform bill explicitly allows the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to include abortion coverage in the ‘community health insurance option,’ and allows federal subsidies to go to private insurance plans that include abortion coverage.  In addition, the bill also requires that at least one private plan in each exchange provide coverage for all abortions. The Senate had the opportunity to follow the House’s lead in ensuring that federal dollars are not used to pay for abortions.  Instead, the Senate chose to reject the Nelson-Hatch-Casey amendment and continue down the road towards unprecedented federal funding of abortion.”

Ashley Horne
Federal Issues Analyst, Focus on the Family Action
“Today, the U.S. Senate failed to protect the preborn and ignored the will of the people they represent. Although 67 percent of Americans oppose the use of federal money to pay for abortion in any government-run healthcare, Senators nevertheless rejected the Hatch-Nelson amendment. Their vote would compel Americans who have moral and religious objects to abortion – and who now make up the majority of the country – to fund it. This is what Thomas Jefferson described as ‘tyrannical.’ Focus on the Family continues to oppose the health care bill because it fails to protect the most vulnerable among us – the preborn. We will keep working diligently to ensure that this faulty legislation does not pass by giving a voice to the millions of Americans who oppose the use of federal funds to pay for abortion.”

Steven Ertelt
Editor and CEO, LifeNews.com
“Senators who opposed the Nelson amendment should be ashamed of themselves for hypocritically calling for ‘choice’ yet forcing Americans to pay for abortions through the health care bill. Their real agenda is exposed through their own votes — they want unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy for any reason funded by the American people. That’s not pro-choice, it is radically pro-abortion.”

 Jennifer Giroux
Executive Director, One More Soul
“Senators think they can dress up abortion and call it ‘healthcare’ but today God fearing American tax-payers have now been forced to pay for an infant holocaust for the first time in our nation’s history.”

 _____________________________

abortion comic stripSenator Sam Brownback (R-KS) described the debate this afternoon in the Senate on the Nelson-Hatch Amendment, which makes sure the government doesn’t fund abortions, as “unusual.” Why? Because the debate is supposed to be about healthcare, not abortion, and certainly not about abortion funding, especially since it has been precedent for the past 30 years that the government does not fund elective abortion.

What’s the big deal? The abortion industry has a lot to gain if the government starts funding abortion, as Charmaine Yoest writes in her open letter to Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards today:

“This Senate health care bill is a bailout for the world’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood. Their lobbying efforts are said to be about empowering women and advancing reproductive health but the bottom line is that Planned Parenthood needs the business.”

The Senate, by most accounts, will vote this afternoon on the Nelson-Hatch amendment. Have you called your Senator and told them to vote in favor of the Nelson amendment and against government funding of abortion?

Go HERE for contact info for your Senators.

Need talking points? Here are the main points we are using below. Feel free to send them to your family and friends and get the word out.

 1) If the Senate healthcare bill is passes without Stupak or Nelson language, it will be the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade.

  • Senators must be urged to vote against any procedure or bill that does not include language identical to either the Nelson or Stupak Amendments, which prevent the government from funding abortion.
  • Abortion is not healthcare, as the abortion industry would like Americans to believe, and it should not be mandated under any health insurance plan, especially one that Americans will be forced to subsidize.

 2) Government-Run Health Care = a bailout of the abortion industry, mandated government-funded abortion, and forcing Americans to subsidize abortions.

  • Americans don’t want this. Recent national polls have all showed Americans don’t support government-funded abortions by wide margins. 
  • The proposed “public plan” would pay for elective abortions, which would be direct funding of elective abortion with federal funds.  This abortion coverage would not be optional – no one would be able to enroll in federal insurance plan without paying an abortion surcharge.
  • In addition, the federal government would subsidize the purchase of private health plans that cover elective abortion on demand — departing from decades of federal policy, under which health plans that cover elective abortions (for example, those covering federal employees) are not eligible for federal subsidies.

 3) The bi-partisan Stupak-Pitts amendment and the Nelson-Hatch amendment do not change the status quo on abortion funding through the government; it IS the status quo. They both mirror the Hyde amendment which prevents the government from funding elective abortion.

Share

Let’s Give Thanks for Pro-Life Heroes

bart_stupak_official_109th_congress_photoCongressman Bart Stupak (D-MI), a Catholic who we have written about in numerous other posts, paved the way for his amendment to be voted on in the House of Representatives before the vote on the overall healthcare bill just a couple weeks ago. His bi-partisan amendment, which prevents the government from funding abortion, passed overwhelmingly in the House with even more votes than the healthcare bill itself.

The Susan B. Anthony List, a great group who helps to elect pro-life politicians, is currently running a positive ad in Bart Stupak’s district in Michigan thanking him for standing up for the unborn, for protecting women and children and for making sure the government doesn’t fund abortions.

Listen to the ad here: Thank you Bart Stupak!

The fight is far from over but it’s great to be thankful for the heros we do have fighting for us (and for those yet to be born).

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

The Senate Healthcare Bill Funds Abortion; Calls it a “compromise”

voided checkAs expected Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid came up with some phony abortion “compromise” language in the healthcare bill he unveiled Wednesday and stripped out the Stupak-Pitts languge which would have prevented the government from funding abortion.

Here’s what you need to know: It’s NOT Stupak-Pitts language. In fact, it’s the opposite.

While Stupak/Pitts would have ensured that elective abortion was kept out of the public plan, the Reid  language explicitly authorizes the Secretary of Health & Human Services (pro-abortion ex-Kansas governor Kathleen Sebelius) to include abortion in the public option.  And while Stupak/Pitts would prohibit government subsidies from contributing to insurance policies that include elective abortion, the Senate language permits government subsidies for plans that pay for abortion

Reid tried to satisfy the abortion industry by mirroring the Capps amendment which allows federal funding of abortion. In fact, Rep. Lois Capps (D-Ca.), who has a 100% pro-abortion voting record, said in a press release following release of the Reid language:  “It appears that their approach closely mirrors my language which was originally included in the House bill.” Senator Boxer, also an ardent pro-choicer, has given her endorsement to the language saying, “Senator Reid did an excellent job of crafting language…” 

The fact that the Senate bill funds abortion isn’t even lost on the liberal media.

An MSNBC.com story about the Senate health care reform bill states:

On a controversial issue that threatened to derail the House legislation, Reid’s Senate measure would allow the new government insurance plan to cover abortions and would let companies that receive federal funds offer insurance plans that include abortion coverage.

A provision in the House bill — passed at the insistence of anti-abortion Democrats over strenuous objections from liberals — banned both those things. Reid failed in his attempt to include stricter abortion language.

Didn’t Reid WRITE the language? How did he “fail in his attempt to include stricter abortion language?”

And like the House bill, the Senate version would levy a new “abortion premium” fee on Americans in the government-run plan. 

Senator Jim DeMint dredges up a John Kerry flip-flopper line that works great for the very important “cloture” vote this weekend in the Senate:

Don’t let [the Senators] vote for a government takeover of health care before they vote against it.  no button

Why? A vote for cloture is a vote for the government-run plan because that would bring the bill to the floor for the debate. For the bill to pass, Reid only needs a majority, which he has. For cloture, he needs 60, which he may not have. So the Senators could very well vote for cloture and then vote against the bill and tell constituents they tried to prevent healthcare from being passed.

The vote on cloture tomorrow night is a vote for government-funded abortion.

Main points:

  • The 2,074-page Senate healthcare reform bill has rejected the bipartisan Stupak-Pitts Amendment and substituted phony language that would result in government-funded abortion.
  • A vote to allow the Senate healthcare bill to be debated on the floor through “cloture” is a vote for government-funded abortion.
  •  The bi-partisan Stupak-Pitts amendment does not change the status quo on abortion funding through the government; it IS the status quo. It mirrors the Hyde amendment which prevents the government from funding elective abortion.

 Contact your Senators NOW – the vote on cloture is very important. Don’t let Reid get the healthcare bill to the floor.

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

What’s Going on in the Senate? Jill Stanek Boils It Down

Jill StanekIn her column today at World Net Daily, pro-life blogger Jill Stanek tackles the mumbo jumbo procedures of the Senate that are important to the pro-life cause.

Basically, Senate Majority Leader Democrat Harry Reid is pushing to get the Senate version of healthcare to the floor for a vote but he can’t just bring it to the floor and make Senators vote on it. He has to go through a few procedures (votes) to get the bill to the floor. But there’s lots of problems with that.

 1)      The bill is still in “concept” so Reid has to bring a “shell bill” (an empty bill) to the floor and then substitute his yet-to-be-written-and-unveiled bill into it by a vote.

2)      To get the shell bill to the floor itself, he has to have a vote on that, which is called a cloture vote and he needs 60 votes to pass it. Jill says that “This is the first and very important choke point to stop the Senate’s health-care bill from proceeding.”harry reid

So if Reid can’t pass the cloture vote, then he can’t even get the big bill on healthcare to the floor. This is important.

This is the first and very important choke point to stop the Senate’s health-care bill from proceeding. I’m told that all Republican senators, including Olympia Snowe, are planning to vote “no” on cloture. That means Reid will need 60 bodies physically present who will also vote “yes.” But several Democrat senators and Sen. Joe Lieberman are squishy, with various concerns in addition to publicly funded abortion.

These senators are our targets: Bayh, Byrd, Casey, Collins, Conrad, Dorgan, T. Johnson, Landrieu, Lincoln, McCaskill, Nelson, Pryor, Reid, Snowe and Warner.

We must pound them with calls. The ideal would be to shut down Senate phone lines.

The message is:

Vote “No” on any health-care bill or procedure that does not include the Stupak pro-life amendment at a minimum and that will protect and preserve life both young and old.

Contact your Senator here: http://bit.ly/2jE5Ie. It’s important to call YOUR own Senator and let them know you are a constituent.

Jill has lots of other helpful info in her column today including the incorrect talking points that the pro-choicers are using when they say that the Stupak-Pitts amendment goes beyond the status quo on government funding of abortion. Hint: they are way off base. See Jill’s full column here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116382

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

The Health Care Police

It makes perfect sense.  If the government is in charge of health care – lowering costs, rationing care, deciding what needs immediate treatment – then it seems reasonable that eventually they may have to pay you a visit to make sure you are keeping your home in a way that maximizes good health.

Don’t think it could happen?  Neither did people in the UK until it was reported this week that Health and Safety inspectors will be given “unprecedented access” to family homes to make sure that citizens are protecting their children from household accidents.

As I said, this makes perfect sense.  People cannot cry for a public option and then complain when the government takes reasonable steps to mitigate rising costs.  All we can hope is that the government doesn’t abuse this power.  But, who could stop them once they are in charge of health care?

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

President Obama: Planned Parenthood’s Puppet

obama puppetWhere does one draw the lines when accusing another of being purposely deceitful? Perhaps when it can easily be proven through an extensive paper/video trail.

President Obama clearly needs to pay back the abortion industry for their extensive support and he owes them dearly. So much so that he is quite clearly a puppet at the hands of Planned Parenthood and their allies.

As long as Obama said that no federal funds would pay for abortion but continued to work behind-the-scenes to make sure the opposite was true, Planned Parenthood kept quiet and only urged their members to make sure that reproductive care was funded by the government in healthcare reform.

But once the Stupak amendment passed the House a week ago, all hell broke loose and PP sought a good return on their investment, making sure that President Obama would do everything he could to strip the Stupak language from the healthcare bill.

The quotes below easily catch President Obama trying to please both sides of the debate while getting caught in obvious deception:

“In my mind reproductive care is essential care; it is basic care. So it is at the center and at the heart of the plan I propose. Essentially what we are doing is to say that we are going to set up a public plan…it will be a plan that will provide all essential services, including reproductive services. We also will subsidize those who prefer to stay in the private insurance market except the insurers will have to abide by the same rules in terms of providing comprehensive care including reproductive care.”
-Senator Obama, Speech to Planned Parenthood, July 17, 2007

 “Under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions…”
-President Obama, Address to Congress, 9/9/09

“And we’re not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions. And I want to make sure that the provision that emerges meets that test—that we are not in some way sneaking in funding for abortions, but, on the other hand, that we’re not restricting women’s insurance choices…”
-President Obama, ABC News, 11/10/09

 “White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod suggested…President Obama will intervene to make sure a controversial amendment restricting federal funding for abortion coverage is stripped from final health care reform legislation.”
-Fox News, 11/15/09

Don’t be fooled. The President is going to do everything he can to make sure federal funds will pay for abortion. Not only is he the most pro-abortion president in history but he is beholden to the will of Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry.

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

Pro-Aborts in Full Damage Control Mode; Attack Catholic Church

The abortion industry is in full damage control mode after Saturday’s vote in the House passing the Stupak Amendment, which makes sure that no government money funds abortion. It passed the House with 240 bi-partisan votes, which is 20 more votes than what the overall healthcare passed with.

 NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan and Catholics for a Free Choice president Jon O’Brien took to the pages of Politico today to lash out against the country’s Catholic bishops and their supposed “double standard.”

 Nancy and Jon are clearly grasping at straws in their attack on the Catholic bishops. Here’s their op-ed below with our comments in red. Enjoy.

  Thomelogohe Catholic bishops’ double standard
By: Nancy Keenan and Jon O’Brien 
November 10, 2009 05:28 PM EST

 As advocates for reproductive health, we are outraged at what transpired in the House over the weekend.

 Translation: We want Americans to pay for abortions and we are livid that pro-lifers voted to make sure women pay for their own abortions.

 The passage of the Stupak-Pitts amendment goes far beyond the status quo on abortion restrictions and would make it nearly impossible for insurance plans in the new system to offer abortion coverage. 

 Actually, the Stupak-Pitts amendment put back the status quo on abortion restrictions into the healthcare bill – otherwise the bill would have blown the status quo out of the water by allowing the federal government to pay for abortion on demand.

This campaign succeeded in large part because its supporters perpetuated falsehoods about abortion coverage in the new system. 

 Why must the abortion industry continue to outright lie when it comes to this? I mean, doesn’t it get old once even liberal media outlets are proving you wrong? See the FactCheck.org article here, the TIME mag article here and the AP story here. FactCheck says: “Despite what Obama said, the House bill would allow abortions to be covered by a federal plan and by federally subsidized private plans.”

Most notably, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and its allies in the House distorted the facts about the health reform proposal by claiming that the proposed system would have used federal dollars to cover abortion care. They’re wrong. 

 See comment above. No, Nancy & Jon – you and everyone perpetuating your myths are wrong.

The original House bill included a compromise that required all plans to separate public and private dollars in the new system — ensuring that no tax dollars would ever cover abortion services. 

 Sure they did and it’s called the Capps Amendment which is a bookkeeping scheme and phony compromise. First, the amendment was written by staff to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Ca.), and offered by Rep. Lois Capps (D-Ca.), both of whom have 100 percent pro-abortion career records. Secondly, the Capps Amendment explicitly authorizes the federal government to pay for abortions and those that sign up for the public plan will be charged an “abortion surcharge.”

In fact, the bishops should be familiar with this arrangement because it reflects the same principle of separation that guides their financial interaction with the federal government. The bishops have a long history of almost unlimited access to enormous quantities of federal funding. When it comes to funding for Catholic schools and hospitals or programs run by Catholic Charities, they accept federal funding with open arms. The bishops never question their own ability to lawfully manage funds from separate sources to ensure that tax dollars don’t finance religious practices. 

 Catholics hold that a government-run “anything” should only be considered as an absolute last resort. We believe in subsidiarity - that the government shouldn’t take away from individuals what they (the individuals) can accomplish “by their own enterprise and industry.” (Pope Pius XI). Catholic Charities does great work, work that cannot be done if the government itself were handling. In fact, there is great risk to individual freedom once the government takes over something.

 Yet they reject the idea that others could do the same. This is the very definition of hypocrisy. 

 And you think that the government will siphon out funds and make sure Americans don’t pay for abortions? Are you serious?

For example, Catholic hospitals depend on federal funding. Indiana has 35 Catholic hospitals and 26 other Catholic health-care facilities. In 2007, 58 percent of patients who visited these facilities were covered by Medicaid or Medicare, a proportion reflected across the country. With well over half of their revenue coming from the government, it is safe to say that Catholic hospitals survive on government funding as well as contributions from private sources. 

Here’s where you both really took a wrong turn. One in six patients in the US is cared for in a Catholic hospital and you know where poor patients are sent who don’t have insurance? To a Catholic hospital. You fail to mention that the Senate bill lacks any sort of conscience protections for doctors and other healthcare professionals who decline to perform or refer for abortions – that’s because you want to force all doctors to perform abortions or don’t even become an ob-gyn, right? In a recent survey of faith-based physicians, when asked if they would do abortions or quit their jobs if the government forced them to make that decision, 95% said they’d quit. What if Catholic hospitals are forced to close or rather than perform abortions? Who will care for the hundreds of thousands of patients then? Some doctors have something to say about that here.

Catholic Charities, the domestic direct service arm of the bishops, also depends on state and federal dollars. Sixty-seven percent of Catholic Charities’ income comes from government funding. That represents over $2.6 billion in 2008 — an amount that is more than three times as large as the next largest charitable recipient of federal funds, the YMCA. Just as Catholic hospitals do, Catholic Charities receives enormous quantities of government dollars while abiding by existing constitutional and statutory requirements that prevent government sponsorship of religion. 

 What does this have to do with anything? Planned Parenthood gets hundreds of millions of dollars a year from taxpayers.

The bishops know that a vast majority of Americans, including Catholics, disagree with their hard-line dictates regarding reproductive-health care, including the bishops’ opposition to contraception.

 That is what the Catholic Church believes and has passed on through the centuries. It’s not a matter of debate. Accept that they have a different view than you both and move on.

However, when it comes to health care reform — from which many millions of people will benefit — the bishops injected divisive politics into the process and overran a compromise that would have guaranteed that no federal dollars would cover abortion care. 

 1) Rory Cooper at Heritage says that The U.S. Conference of Bishops has every constitutional protection under the first amendment to petition their government, without fear that the head of the Progressive Caucus will use the IRS to intimidate them, or call them “bullies.” 2) There is no compromise on federal funding of abortion – the government either funds abortion or it doesn’t. There never was a compromise that the bishops overran.

As this debate moves forward, U.S. senators and the public should challenge the bishops’ hypocrisy. If separation of federal funds and private dollars works for the church hierarchy, then it should also work for women’s reproductive-health care. 

 Catholics are called to live their faith in every area of their lives and government is no different (see Bishop Tobin’s  smackdown of Patrick Kennedy when politicians fail to do this in the public square). It’s the job of the Catholic bishops to lead and educate Catholics. U.S. Senators should be listening to their constituents – the majority of whom oppose government funding of abortion and who oppose a government takeover of healthcare overall.

Nancy Keenan is president of NARAL Pro-Choice America and Jon O’Brien is president of Catholics for Choice.

 © 2009 Capitol News Company, LLC 

Join Our Mailing List
Email:


For Email Marketing you can trust

Share

BREAKING: Docs Aren’t Backing Down on HCR

BREAKING: The pro-life movement, if they hasn’t already, is really kicking into high gear over healthcare reform and the doctors aren’t going down without a fight . Check out Dr. Sandy Christiansen and Dr. Ali Tsai, both OB-GYNs who say they will be forced to leave their profession if strong conscience protections are not put into healthcare legislation. Conscience protections were voted down in the Senate (see here) and the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has a good explanation of why this is really bad for both doctors and patients here.

The short video also makes the great point that thousands of doctors will be forced to quit if comprehensive conscience protections aren’t in healthcare legislation and then what happens when millions of new patients flood the system and there aren’t a sufficient number of doctors to care for them?

Share this video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7MbRMQpFhw

Share

Abortion: The Healthcare Holdup

bulldozerHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to bulldoze healthcare reform through the House this week but is being held up by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-MI), and many others who share his views on abortion, who are trying to make sure abortion is not funded by the government.

Pelosi and her pro-abortion allies are desperately trying to come up with a compromise to strip away pro-life Dems from Stupak’s coalition but so far, it’s a no-go.

pelosi whisperIt’s either the government funds abortion or it doesn’t. No wonder they can’t reach a compromise.

Not to get into the weeds too much but a fake compromise was brought up by Rep. Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) that was promptly shot down which basically let the government hire out contractors to pay for abortion services. Any thinking person could see through that smokescreen. National Right to Life is working overtime to make sure everyone knows how fake this compromise really is: http://bit.ly/2udXnw.
Pelosi has got to be pulling her hair out at this point. Here’s what major news outlets are reporting:

New York Times - The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, a supporter of abortion rights, has little choice but to heed the concerns of members of her caucus who oppose abortion.  

The HillBut Ellsworth’s plan has run into opposition from anti-abortion rights groups. The U.S. Conference of Bishops has rejected the “segregated-funds” approach. “They’re not strengthening the language, they’re strengthening their camouflage,” said Douglas Johnson of National Right to Life.

 Reuters - Democrats in the House of Representatives scrambled on Wednesday to iron out lingering concerns over abortion in a healthcare reform bill that was headed to a close and potentially historic weekend debate.

 It’s not over yet so please continue to reach out to your elected officials and tell them you don’t want abortion funding in the healthcare bill.

 As Catholics, we have a civic duty to voice our concerns when a grave injustice is being committed in our society. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, in section 2238, says-

 [Catholics] loyal collaboration includes the right, and at times the duty, to voice their just criticisms of that which seems harmful to the dignity of persons and to the good of the community. (emphasis ours)

 Contact your Representatives HERE.

Share