Doug Kmiec Should Help Obama Keep His Campaign Promises

Jill StanekPro-life blogger and columnist Jill Stanek calls to task in her World Net Daily column today US Ambassador to Malta Doug Kmiec, a Catholic law professor who wrote a book that conveniently came out 7 weeks before the election last year entitled “Can a Catholic Support Him?” As you can guess, Kmiec, who touts himself as a pro-lifer, answered with a resounding “yes, Catholics can certainly support Obama!”

Why would a pro-life Catholic say that it’s okay to vote for a candidate who, at every chance he got, voted against life? Because Kmiec delved deep into the abyss of “common ground” and came to the conclusion that both Catholics and Obama want to reduce the need for abortions and unwanted pregnancies. Never mind that Obama and Catholics fundamentally differ on what happens to the baby after conception and whether or not that child should be killed.

 So, as Kmiec explained it, Obama’s plan to lower the number of abortions if elected president was to pre-empt them by focusing on personal responsibility and education, which he saw as the “primary obligation of the community.”

 Personal responsibly and education trumps the right to life? Mr. Kmiec should go find that in Catholic teaching and come back later when he has the citations.

Anyway, the focus of Jill’s piece is on the fact that President Obama, while promising that he wants to reduce the need for abortion, specifically asked Congress to fund abortions in Washington, DC, which, as Jill points out, is the “abortion capitol of the world,” where 54% of all pregnancies end in abortion.

 And studies show that “decreased public funding of abortion results in 25 percent fewer abortions. So if Obama signs this bill, one of four babies who would have otherwise lived will be killed.”

It makes no sense for Obama to support federal funding of abortion since it will increase the number of abortions. But then again, maybe that was all just rhetoric- rhetoric that Kmiec helped to promote to no end.

 Obama appears to be thwarting his own intentions by increasing access to abortion in an obviously abortion-vulnerable population, like giving an alcoholic a drink or taking a gambling addict to the casino.

 So, what’ll be Mr. Kmiec? Do you stand by Obama as he breaks his promise to all those pro-life Catholics who got on your bandwagon?

 Doug, we need you to help President Obama stand by those campaign promises you explained to us!   You may have to drag yourself away from sipping Maltese honey liqueur and smoking spicy Maltese Cheroots with dignitaries on the embassy’s sun terrace, but it’s a sacrifice well worth making, we’re sure you’ll agree.

Share

President Misleads New Ambassador to Malta

It’s hard to know where to begin with this. It’s both sad and infuriating at the same time.

 

First of all, for those of you who do not remember Professor Douglas Kmiec, he is a conservative Catholic pro-life family man who made headlines and upset pro-life Catholics everywhere last year when he “enthusiastically” supported Barack Obama for the presidency.

 

Two weeks ago, Professor Kmiec was sworn in as Ambassador to Malta after being nominated to the position by now President Obama, and though it has caught little attention, catholicculture.org reported on an interview Ambassador Kmiec gave to The Times of Malta in which he discusses how a conservative pro-life Catholic came to support a candidate like Barack Obama.

Kmiec also recounted a conversation in which then-Senator Obama called abortion the “taking of the life of a child”:

Mr Obama asked Prof. Kmiec: “What would cause a mother to contemplate taking the life of a child? It has to be something awful. It has to be a woman without shelter, without insurance, without the next meal on the table.”

I guess we are all supposed to be impressed that President Obama said abortion is the “taking of the life of a child.” However, Obama has refused to be this clear with the rest of us, stating instead that such knowledge is “above his paygrade.” It would be nice for the President to have been this clear at his Notre Dame speech back in May.

 

But the truly disturbing part of this exchange is the second part when Obama reflects on the demographics of abortion. As for Kmiec, I have no reason to question his sincerity. He has a track record for being a conservative pro-life guy. He could simply be misinformed about the reality of abortion and who it affects.

 

But, as for Obama, I have a very hard time believing that the most pro-abortion president we have ever had, who has spent his entire career working side-by-side with Planned Parenthood and NARAL, and accepting endorsements and campaign contributions from pro-choice advocacy groups, and voting against the Infants Born Alive acts in IL, and stating publically that abortion is a necessary medical right, and reversing the Mexico City Policy days after becoming president, and nominating himself to be the mediator in the public debate on abortion, really and truly believes that the only people who get abortions are starving homeless people.

 

Starving homeless people? If that’s the case, then who is purchasing these T-Shirts from Amazon.com?

 

Again, it is sad that there are people – good people – like Professor Kmiec who are probably just terribly misinformed about the reality of abortion.

 

But, it is infuriating that there are people like the president who use their influence to keep people like Kmiec in the dark.

 

Patrick Looby, Fredericksburg, VA

Share