Tag Archives: climate change

Can’t Save The Environment By Declaring War On Creation

Environmentalist that advocates for massive changes in US life style and wealth transfers to developing countries displayed their ugly side yesterday. A story titled Population Control Called Key To Deal in the China Daily exposed what has been a fear here at St Michael Society; the environmental movement’s war on children in the womb.  Here is one of many horrible quotes from the story:

 “Although China’s family planning policy has received criticism over the past three decades, Zhao said that China’s population program has made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society.”

 As a result of the family planning policy, China has seen 400 million fewer births, which has resulted in 18 million fewer tons of CO2 emissions a year, Zhao said.”

A refresher; “China’s family planning policy” is nothing to be proud of and includes forced abortions as a way to enforce their mandated one child per family law.  Saving the environment does not include declaring war on children in the womb. Nor does it include removing the gift of creation from the sexual act.

UP DATE:  Finacial Post runs a horrible op-ed that concludes climate warming or cooling is not the problem, but humans are overpopulating the world and the world should adopt the China one child policy.

Let’s be clear. We are all called upon to be good responsible stewards of creation.  The world around us is a living display of God’s great love for mankind.  As we have written before, we at St Michael Society do not oppose legitimate efforts to ensure that we pass on this gift intact to future generations. 

On the other hand, we will fight any effort that pits mother against child in her womb, husband against wife or couple against their gift of making a new life.  Population control can never be a solution.

  • Share/Bookmark

It’s Not Just Health Care, Climate Change Policies Take Aim at The Unborn

While many Catholics and pro-life organizations have rightly focused their efforts on keeping abortion and euthanasia out of health care, population control advocates are pushing hard for global populationist  policies as a way to neutralize climate change.  Steve Mosher has a story revealing these efforts from a few days ago here. http://bit.ly/3nmoE

Cardinal Justin Rigali, Chairman of the Pro-Life Committee of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, recently took issue with environmentalists pushing for population control, via abortion (including vacuum abortions), abortifacients and other forms of contraception, as a way to confront climate change.  The Cardinal also advocated for larger families when he emphasized that small family sizes are bankrupting Social Security and Medicare.

Cardinal Rigali criticizes population control as way to curb climate change

Cardinal Rigali criticizes population control as way to curb climate change

Cardinal Rigali:

“It should not be surprising that the neglect, and even the death, of some people are offered as a solution to rising health care costs. Population control advocates have long espoused aborting children in the developing world as a misguided means for reducing poverty.

“Some environmentalists now claim that the most efficient way to curb global climate change is to make ‘family planning’ more widely available in the developing world. They report that an average of 2.3 pounds per day of exhaled carbon dioxide can be eliminated from the atmosphere by eliminating one human being. As used by population control advocates, the innocuous term ‘family planning’ includes abortifacient contraceptives, sterilization, and manual vacuum aspiration abortions …

Since the advent of widespread contraception and abortion, a cultural hostility to children has grown. They are often depicted as costly encumbrances who interfere with a carefree adult life. No fewer than six recent books are dedicated to defending the childless-by-choice lifestyle – for selfish reasons, or to counter ‘overpopulation,’ a thoroughly discredited myth. In fact, if married couples were to have more children, Medicare and Social Security would not be hurtling toward bankruptcy.

“Since 1955, because of fewer children and longer life spans, the number of workers has declined relative to the number of beneficiaries, from 8.6 to only 3.1 workers paying benefits to support each beneficiary. Without substantially more young people to enter the work force as young adults, in 25 years, there will be only 2.1 workers supporting each beneficiary. Eliminating our young does not solve problems even on pragmatic grounds. It adds to them.”

Amen.

  • Share/Bookmark