Category Archives: Supreme Court

The Kagan Abortion Distortion Spreads

We’ve highlighted Shannen Coffin’s analysis of documents  from Obama Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan concerning partial-birth abortion. It is interesting to see how far her distortion from in 1996 spread. 

When she twisted the words of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) her distortion entered the bloodstream of American political debate. In documents released by the Clinton library, Elena Kagan commented that it “would be a disaster” if the ACOG memorandum would become public.  ACOG stated “the vast majority of cases, selection of the partial-birth procedure is not necessary to avert serious adverse consequences to a woman’s health.” Instead she pushed aside science and in search of a political victory and proposed the ACOG include the following language “An intact D&X [medical term for partial birth abortion], however, maybe the best the most appropriate receipt you’re in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman.”

12 years later the Senator Obama refers to the ACOG statement in his pro abortion speech to Plannned Parenthood:

Obama ends his speech with these words: “It’s time for us to change that. It is time for a different attitude in the White House. It is time for a different attitude in the Supreme Court. It is time to turn the page and write a new chapter in American history.”

These are words to remember during this political season as we begin to turn the page on the last two years of American history.

Share

Pro-Lifers Weigh In On Obama Supreme Court Nominee, Elena Kagan

Pro-life groups are speaking out today against President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan. There isn’t much of a paper trail on Kagan but from what pro-lifers have been able to glean, and the fact that NARAL has thrown their support behind her, confirming Kagan would be a serious setback for the unborn.

President Obama said just recently that while he doesn’t have a litmus test for a nominee, he does want ”somebody who is going to be interpreting our Constitution in a way that takes into account individual rights, and that includes women’s rights.” We have to presume Kagan fits that description.

A big concern that is Kagan has indicated she may be sympathetic to using international laws to make and interpret laws in the US, including an unlimited abortion right.

Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, told LifeNews.com that “abortion groups are actively attempting to create the impression that international norms require countries to provide access to abortion. During Kagan’s nomination hearing for Solicitor General, Senator Specter questioned her about the use of foreign sources of law in constitutional decision-making.”

Students for Life of America launched www.IOpposeKagan.com this morning and are asking people to sign a petition in opposition to confirming Elena Kagan.

And Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, said that “Elena Kagan has strong ties to abortion-advocacy organizations and expressed admiration for activist judges who have worked to advance social policy rather than to impartially interpret the law.”

On background on Elena Kagan, AUL revealed that:

Kagan not only publicly and repeatedly criticized federal regulations that prohibited recipients of Title X family planning funds from counseling on or referring women for abortions, she argued that the regulations amounted to the subsidization of ‘anti-abortion’ speech. Kagan will further entrench the Court’s self-appointed role as the sole arbiter of abortion policy because she believes the role of judges is to ‘advance’ social policy rather than faithfully apply the law. 

Stay tuned to St. Michael Society for continual updates regarding the Supreme Court battle.

Share

Conservative Legal Experts React to Kagan Supreme Court Nomination

Following are two resourceful sites from the Federalist Society and the Judicial Crisis Network that will provide up to date information, news reports, commentary, etc, regarding the Supreme Court nomination of Elena Kagan. Also, below is a link to conservative legal expert comments regarding the Kagan nomination and coming hearing.

http://www.scotusreport.com

http://www.judicialnetwork.com/

CONSERVATIVE LEGAL EXPERTS REACT TO KAGAN NOMINATION

http://www.judicialnetwork.com/news/conservative-legal-experts-react

Share

Does Anyone Expect a Good Supreme Court Nominee from Obama? No.

President Obama, who is probably worn out from the year long healthcare battle, has yet another fight ahead as he prepares to pick his 2nd nomination for the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is a very powerful entity and can and has delivered quite a few blows to the pro-life agenda in the past several decades.

Picking the right Justice, even though they are nominated by the Executive branch of government, begins in the voting booth. It is crucial to vote into office people who have solid values and morals, built on firm Christian principles, if we want our Justices to reflect those same values that we hold so dear.

If Americans elect a President who, say, voted several times against protecting babies who are born alive after a botched abortion, what is the likelihood that he would nominate a pro-life Justice that adheres to the Constitution and respects the right to life? Very little.

 CNN released a poll yesterday that showed most Americans think that Obama will nominate a liberal to replace Justice Stevens BUT that one in four don’t want that to happen. Of those polled, “37 percent saying they want Obama to name a moderate and 36 percent pulling for a conservative candidate.”

 This is what happens when America elects a liberal President – we get liberal Justices.

And just to be sure we all know where Obama stands, yesterday he said that while there’s no litmus test for his nominee, “he will make sure his choice ‘takes into account individual rights, and that includes women’s rights.’”

 This is why elections are so crucial. The healthcare reform bill, which funds abortion on demand with government funds, will no doubt be challenged in court and it is very likely the ultimate decision will be made at the Supreme Court level as to whether or not the legislation is Constitutional.

 We’ll be following the Supreme Court fight closely so check back here for updates.

Share